A Pacquiao question without any insults

nah, it's not a rule... i hae watched fights wherein fighters were given a 10-6 card because of three kd's... i'd like to believe you but i'll disagree with you... I think Manny won that fight clearly...If Marquez floored Pacman 3 times also then its a draw...The judges did not gave credit that the fighter was down 3 times.

i didn't quite get the point... 3 kd's in a round gives you, supposedly, a 10-6 card... why do you say they don't score below a 10-7??? that's the least they can do for nullifying the three-kd rule... no they dont if u r down 5 times in 1 round they judges will have it a 10-7 round they do not score bellow that cause it would put a fighter to far out of a fight its a rule

Pac wasnt robbed, he had a man on the verge of annihilation and didnt close the show. He was countered punched effectively by Marquez rounds 3 through 12 and I think that Pac won rounds 1,2,9 and 10 clearly. There were a lot of close rounds, but Marquez deserved the draw for coming back the way he did, and did so in a very effective manner. And Pac doesnt deserve the win for not being able to do much but throw one straight left all night. If he would have put some combinations in there, he could and likely would have KO'd Marquez. I have learn to accept the draw and its fine with me, that fight is as close as it is, only conclusion is to have the rematch and i want to see it this year ....

Here is how I saw the fight: Pacquiao - Rounds 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 Marquez - Rounds 3, 4, 5, 6 Then Round 12 is a toss-up it can go either way. And even when you give to Marquez, Pacquiao should have won but was robbed. On round 7, Pacquiao learned how to block Marquez' punch to the head by putting his arms steady and up high and then Pacquiao counterpunched. Any other way of seeing it are either blind or in somebody's payroll. This is the fairest assestment I can deliver. Pac wasnt robbed, he had a man on the verge of annihilation and didnt close the show. He was countered punched effectively by Marquez rounds 3 through 12 and I think that Pac won rounds 1,2,9 and 10 clearly. There were a lot of close rounds, but Marquez deserved the draw for coming back the way he did, and did so in a very effective manner. And Pac doesnt deserve the win for not being able to do much but throw one straight left all night. If he would have put some combinations in there, he could and likely would have KO'd Marquez.

The worse excuse was from Barrera..."I was not myself during the fight" What was he thinking when he made that excuse...He might have a split personality!!! lol I think he just said how he felt. He didnt say he lost the fight because he wasnt himself.

"JMM pretty much won EVERY round after the first except for a couple." Quit smoking that shit. You got sucked into the "hype" of the comeback. _______________________________

Pacs hand was hurt but not enough to make him throw with less authority. obviously it was hurt enough to make him throw with less authority seeing how he did. i had pac winning by the skin of his teeth. but i do give marquez mad props for gettin up from the canvas 3 times and coming back to almost win it.

LETS TRY TO SEE... :) ILL GIVE ERIK UNTIL 5RNDS. :) ITS CORRECT THAT PACQUIAO HAS A SPRAIN ON HIS KNUCKLE. :) AND BLISTER ON HIS FOOT BECAUSE OF THE SOCK, I CAN SEE THAT WHEN HE WAS INTERVIEWED ON A NATIONAL TELEVISION AFTER THE FIGHT. http://www.newsflash.org/2004/02/pictures/00001082.jpg bro you're new here? check out the forum pinoy lang... it's for us ... pinoys! going back to the thread.. a question would be, will morales cry? because definitely he will lose badly.... i know that coz i'm a fortune teller

LETS TRY TO SEE... :) ILL GIVE ERIK UNTIL 5RNDS. :) ITS CORRECT THAT PACQUIAO HAS A SPRAIN ON HIS KNUCKLE. :) AND BLISTER ON HIS FOOT BECAUSE OF THE SOCK, I CAN SEE THAT WHEN HE WAS INTERVIEWED ON A NATIONAL TELEVISION AFTER THE FIGHT. http://www.newsflash.org/2004/02/pictures/00001082.jpg

yep, just the same way your are pacnuthugger :D i dont think Pac wants anyone hugging his nuts it must be painful :thinking:

remember that judges dotn socre bellow a 10-7 round so even with 3 knock downs doesnt mean he can win pac still needed to win 5 more rounds after that to win cause a 8-4 round socre for JMM would make the score 113-112 for jmm (i think my math is correct)

yep, just the same way your are pacnuthugger :D Alright let's keep this on the other Pac thread.

Another brainless remark!!! tsk tsk tsk!!! yep, just the same way your are pacnuthugger :D

let the fight be done in the ring and not boxing forums! Well said.

yeah people need more class, thats why boxers get labeled as stuppid class less people, Thank you guys. :grumble: let the fight be done in the ring and not boxing forums!

People respect point of views. Not everyone does but I know I do and most people on this board do. But you can't just go around calling everyone names. And engaging in a war of words with other memebers that has no point except to call each other stupid and such. What does that have to do with boxing? If someone ahs a point of view different from yours or makes fun of someone you hold in high regard just ignore them and post only things related to boxing. yeah people need more class, thats why boxers get labeled as stuppid class less people, Thank you guys. :grumble:

And I don't know about other threads, but I didn't read one comment about you being a nuthugger on this one.

Nope your wrong! What is a forum for? It is to express each others belief but the problem with other people here is that they dont want to repect other peoples view. They just condemn someone as a nut hugger if you are making a point! People respect point of views. Not everyone does but I know I do and most people on this board do. But you can't just go around calling everyone names. And engaging in a war of words with other memebers that has no point except to call each other stupid and such. What does that have to do with boxing? If someone ahs a point of view different from yours or makes fun of someone you hold in high regard just ignore them and post only things related to boxing.

Ok Nope your wrong! What is a forum for? It is to express each others belief but the problem with other people here is that they dont want to repect other peoples view. They just condemn someone as a nut hugger if you are making a point! As i said i got no problem with your opinion, i know you like Pac-Man, and I like Moralez. and i got no problem with you liking Pac-Man, and i hope you dont have one with me either. i've never called you a nut hugger, but i do have a problem with you makeing remarks like "fag" and such, im not gay but i got no problem with them and unless they did something wrong to you, i dont see why you have to degrade them like that.

Class Why are you hurt with gay remarks? no but unlike you i got class and i dont make remarks about anyone's sexual life, serisuly when you run out of real insults you just start calling everyone a "Fag" or are you just a homofob??