I don`t agree with belts making boxers champs. The Undisputed champion is the man for carrys the linarage of his weight division. Naseem Hamed in my opinion was undisputed featherweight champion as he beat IBF champ Tom Johnson, WBA champ Vazquez ( although Vazquez vacated, he still hadn`t been beaten for that title ) and WBC champ Soto. Hamed was WBO already. Even though he didn`t hold the belts, he had beaten the champions. He was a true undisputed champ, untill Barrera bitched him, then Barrera was undisputed champ!
Yeah, there's so many organization out there that you don't need all of their belts to be the undisputed champ. Heck, with all the crazy stuff going out there, you don't even need a belt to be undisputed. ;)
i'll drink to that. ;)
undisputed just means not disputed meaning everyone recognizes you as the champ.
then again there are haters that even if you have all the belts if your not linear would say otherwise
i second this definition.
Yeah, there's so many organization out there that you don't need all of their belts to be the undisputed champ. Heck, with all the crazy stuff going out there, you don't even need a belt to be undisputed. ;)
I still feel tszyu is undisputed champ because he is clearly the best in the division.
Also: he won all the belts (the 3 major belts: WBC, WBA and IBF) and did not loose them in a fight.
if you win two belts then you're unified champ, and if you win 3 then you're undisputed champ. the wbo belt isn't as glamourous as the others. I still feel tszyu is undisputed champ because he is clearly the best in the division.