And in fact Vitaly already met with Byrd and has lost.
Why him put in a rating above?
It is just necessary to give Byrd chance once again to prove, that he is better than Vitaly...
Try to act like a bigger troll.
And in fact Vitaly already met with Byrd and has lost.
Why him put in a rating above?
It is just necessary to give Byrd chance once again to prove, that he is better than Vitaly...
At the moment of 2000 it would be fair.
Vit had more convincing victories (last 3 years) + never any fight (only with Merser) was not given with such hard work for Lewis. For me Vit better. But I strongly want rematch.
And in fact Vitaly already met with Byrd and has lost.
Why him put in a rating above?
It is just necessary to give Byrd chance once again to prove, that he is better than Vitaly...
1- Vitali
2- Byrd
3- An in shape Sanders would probably be my choice, however, Sanders has never been in good shape his entire boxing career. So I'll go with Golota.
You have to put the 3 major champs on top -Klitschko, Byrd, and Ruiz unless you're one of those people who think Golota was robbed which is BS. Based on skills Toney is up there but he has to beat a top 10 HW first . . .
agreed.fres oquendo was robbed 2.
You have to put the 3 major champs on top -Klitschko, Byrd, and Ruiz unless you're one of those people who think Golota was robbed which is BS. Based on skills Toney is up there but he has to beat a top 10 HW first . . .