Oscar De La Hoya-Felix Sturm? Rico Hoye-Montell Griffin? Chris Byrd-Andrew Golota? Sechew Powell-Grady Brewer? Lamon Brewster-Kali Meehan? Or is it another one?
I would saw Hoye-Griffin, because that fight wasn't even close and the wrong guy won.
Emanual Augustus VS Courtney Burton was the worst decision of the year in my opinion- that fight was one sided in Agustus's favor no matter who was looking at it!
That's the only one I saw out of the choices above, so I'd go for that.
he wuz robbed!!!
No question, Augustus vs. Burton was the worst case of home
cooking i've seen in years. I saw that fight, several rounds went by without Burton landing a single punch and they had him winning. BULLSHIT!!! ...Also Byrd - Oquendo, Byrd lost that fight and the judges gave him an early Xmas present
A REAL robbery is the Burton fight. COme on, Marquez-Pacman and Byrd-Golota were close fights and were not clear robberies at all. Just b/c your favorite fighter is in a close fight doesn't mean he won . . .
exactly
people who dont know boxing dont understand the difference between a close fight and a robbery
Come One!!!!!
A REAL robbery is the Burton fight. COme on, Marquez-Pacman and Byrd-Golota were close fights and were not clear robberies at all. Just b/c your favorite fighter is in a close fight doesn't mean he won . . .
Yeah Pac-Marquez has to take my vote of course though without a doubt I'll never forget Juarez-Raheem. Jaurez got saved by the ref without a doubt. I'm sure that ref will be banned. It was disgusting watching it. Maybe the ref wanted to get popular or something because he was the main focus once he got into the habit of yelling at Raheem every 10 seconds.
As for the Pac-Marquez scoring. Ya know it was a close fight though in the end where it matters, if you score everything properly, Pac should have gotten the win. Making these Oops, I didn't know I was suppose to do that or, people usually don't give 10-6s, that's just bad for the sport. Boxing is a hard sport as is with all the corruption. With a judge admitting his wrong scoring AFTER the fight just takes that to the next level. I'll tell you this though, Arum is very good at protecting his fighters...
augustus hands down
right behind him is the santos/margarito robbery in Puerto rico
also sturm got robbed bad...sturm had almost 100 punches connected more then dlh
what people dont seem to get is that there is a difference between a close fight and a robbery
Burton/Augustus was BY FAR the worst of the year
yea i have to agree with you and they didnt even know how to call fights
:D Everybody has their eyes on that SENILE JUDGE . . . what about stupid Cortez . . . he should be under an inquiry rightnow for failing to deduct a point after so many low blow warnings . . . the rule is very very clear on this one . . . a violation of the same after two warnings should results in a point deduction.
Knowing boxing for so long . . .In a fight of such big stature . . . It's unbelievable that a Ref and a JUDGE would FUCK UP BIGTIME at the same time. :rolleyes:
There was also the question of to what language teh ref should count on. Cortez counted slow to me. In spanish also, more syllables.
The Augustus fight was the worse. It was like the Roy Jones loss in the Olympics, pure BS.
The Pac-Marquez fight was a bad decison. 115-110 Marquez??? Why where Pac's people pissed, and Marquez's people okay with the decision?
A knockdown = minus 1 point, that's part of the rules. Not taking the point is just like scoring a touchdown and not getting points for it.
For the Pac-JMM, I had Pac winning 114-111 everytime I scored. Once I went as close as 113-112 but still for Pac. It was the 3 point first round that really hurt JMM.
As for the judge who scored that round 10-7. I just don't get it. Give a boxer his due. Had he knocked down JMM twice, the score would have still been 10-7. So why did he close his eyes for the third knockdown and denied Pac of that point that was well earned. Don't make sense to me.
Also why I think JMM-Pac had the worst scoring is because of the discrepancy in both cards. I mean one had it 115-110 for Pac and the other 115-110 JMM. That means they saw the fight completely different. 10 point difference between both cards!! As fans I would understand. But as judges? Come on...
The Delahoya/Sturm fight was close as was the Pacquiao/Marquez fight. I had Sturm winning the fight by either 116-112 or 115-113. It always flip flops between those to scores. I have Marquez beating Pac everytime I scored that fight though it was close. There were times I came up with a draw 113-113. All the scores with the 10-6 first round. The Raheem fight I feel was closer than what people say. I thought Raheem won but with the deductions I had Juarez winning.
I'll say the Oscar-Mosley 2 fight purely because most people thought Oscar had won that fight. Shane looked so pissed off at the end waitng for that result, he looked like a beaten man. I remember watching that fight with my friends and most of them aren't bothered about boxing and even they thought Oscar had won. He wasn't given a fair decision there. You can always count on the judges to mess things up, luckily Oscar had a big enough reputation to be able to bounce back from that loss and land a good fight.
I have to mention the Marquez-Pcaman fight too, i thought Marquez had just taken that fight. I was so shocked to see how he turned that fight around from that dreadful first round. It's fighters like Marquez that make the term "Heart" just.
I know it, a judge should be perminity banned for not understanding how to score a fight-- that's what he there to do.
he also said a nevada official had told him 10-6 rds were frowned upon...if theres even a grain of truth in that they must of been expecting fast start by pac with multiple knockdowns. how many fights have you seen with 10-6 rounds...not enough to make that call
either some bs excuse the judge came up with or some mega conspriracy
maybe involving mind control, cheap ass sock stores and greasy mexican boots :D :D :D