This fight will have some pretty solid hype on this board. I will give my UK friends on the board this, they always support their fighters faithfully.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Fury Sees Wilder Fight Happening Before Klitschko
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by denium View PostYet another clown who lets his personal dislike of Fury distort his view of him as a fighter.
If he's a bum, so is:
Kabrat Pulev
Bryant Jennings
Bermane Stiverne
Mike Perez
Chris Arreola
Anthony Joshua
etc
http://******.craveonline.com/ratings/heavyweight
You are the one who's riding his nuts for some reason.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Freedom. View PostFury doesn't want to get KOed in his next fight (after Hammer) so he'll fight Wilder first and wait for Wladimir to get a bit older (and of course claim Klitschko is ducking him). But he may not get past Wilder.
Wilder beats him, Klitschko beats him, Povetkin, Jennings, Stiverne, Perez, Joshua, Haye. take your pick
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cut ManQuote:
Originally Posted by denium
Yet another clown who lets his personal dislike of Fury distort his view of him as a fighter.
If he's a bum, so is:
Kabrat Pulev
Bryant Jennings
Bermane Stiverne
Mike Perez
Chris Arreola
Anthony Joshua
etc
http://******.craveonline.com/ratings/heavyweight
I'd have most if not all of those guys you listed to beat Fury right now. Nobody has a personal dislike for Fury. We just know he's a bum
You are the one who's riding his nuts for some reason.
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
Comment
-
Originally posted by denium View PostWell Ring magazine disagrees with you. Did Fury **** your sister or something? Rather than just blindly state that he's a bum, why not give some analysis or opinion as to why?
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
But to use Ring magazine to legitimize Wilders ranking over Fury's
is not a very good idea since Golden Boy owns Ring magazine and
is also Wilders promotion company they are more than a little bias.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cut Man View PostI'd have most if not all of those guys you listed to beat Fury right now. Nobody has a personal dislike for Fury. We just know he's a bum
You are the one who's riding his nuts for some reason.Originally posted by denium View PostWell Ring magazine disagrees with you. Did Fury **** your sister or something? Rather than just blindly state that he's a bum, why not give some analysis or opinion as to why?
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
Fury is the only contender ranked in the top 5 by every single reputable ratings panel.
But some no-mark here thinks he's a bum, so I guess they must all be wrong eh?Last edited by kafkod; 01-27-2015, 06:07 PM.
Comment
-
this is a good fight. make it happen! 2 of the best young HWs on the planet. These are the type of fights people want to see. who wouldn't want to see this?
Comment
-
it doesn't matter who you think will win. it's fights like this that put HW boxing back on the map. wlad is talking about fighting Shannon briggs after Jennings. that was pretty obvious before though as nobody goes to that much trouble to get a title shot without it being a staged setup for a future fight. fury & wilder would bring in 5 times the money as briggs. it would be pretty impressive if wlad went through pulev, Jennings, fury & wilder all in a row. I hope they make wilder/fury & then the winner gets wlad for all the marbles...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cut Man View PostI'd have most if not all of those guys you listed to beat Fury right now. Nobody has a personal dislike for Fury. We just know he's a bum
You are the one who's riding his nuts for some reason.
That was your problem right there.
He's unbeaten, so we don't know anything of the sort.
Even if he did lose to any of the guys mentioned, he wouldn't be a bum and..
Given how good he has been already, we can almost certainly declare the opposite. That Fury will never be a bum!
Comment
Comment