Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Whose your favorite president ever?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    war president camacho

    Comment


    • #72
      Favorite president?...

      ... Warren Buffett - President of Berkshire Hathaway...

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by Mike D View Post
        war president camacho


        it always kills me at "porn super star..."

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by Dean_Razorback View Post


          it always kills me at "porn super star..."


          Comment


          • #75
            Thomas Jefferson because he wrote the Declaration of Independence and he was also anti-slavery, but boned his own slaves. That's super alpha right there. He had wild jungle fever.

            Those are the kind of fantasies I jerk off to.

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by 1bad65 View Post
              No, he did not. As others and myself have shown, many accounting tricks were used (the term 'unfunded liabilities' is one you should check out) in order to make this claim. Those same accounting tricks would get a private sector CEO thrown in prison.
              Yes, Clinton did balance the budget deficit.

              You are completely ignorant.

              But you aren't entitled to your own facts.

              Comment


              • #77
                Another thing you are too ignorant to know is that part of why he could balance the budget was a tax revenue windfall related to the IT bubble.

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by 1bad65 View Post
                  No, it isn't. The fact he cant source it despite being asked proves it's not true.
                  What about that Reagan had alzheimers in office, doe.

                  He was the worst president the country ever had, pre George W. Bush.

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by 1bad65 View Post
                    With all due respect to Truman, he's wrong. No matter what he says you cannot dispute the fact correlation does not prove causation.

                    And again, you were asked to cite Bush-signed policy you blame for the meltdown and recession. Despite your long post you failed to cite any legislation.

                    Please, try again.



                    The methodology is flawed. Again, Bush averaged under 5% unemployment his first 6 years. Six years of sub-5% unemployment proves job creation was happening beyond all doubt. This trend (which is excellent, and a figure most Presidents would kill for) only changed when the housing marked meltdown hit. And as we now know, you've shown that cannot be blamed on Bush. So they simply used his start and end numbers which fails to tell the full truth. It's cherry-picking at it's finest.



                    Yet again, correlation does not prove causation. We now know some of the 9/11 terrorists were able to enter our country due to the 'Wall of Silence' between the CIA and FBI enacted by the Clinton Administration. So again, something well out of his control.

                    You really need to stop using fallacy as fact.



                    That right there shows you've now conceded fact mean less than partisan Party politics to you and thus shows you entire argument is compromised.

                    FYI, you destroyed your own argument. Not too often that happens, so thanks for making it easier for me.

                    Again, it's not a popularity contest. You've shown you have no facts on your side, and you're main argument is fallacy as correlation does not prove causation.

                    The fallacy of false attribution

                    Simply put when crap goes right, that was me, I did it!!!

                    When stuff goes bad, it was the previous guy.

                    In a non linear dynamic system, it is gonna be too complex to create a testable simple linear feedback loop to measure one criteria at a time.

                    Politics is a much more difficult & complex paradigm than CMOS circuit design, feedback loops need nano seconds to see results, but deal with simple digital logic base on pre defined inputs. Digital logic. But presidents & politics deal with the infinite number of permutations/possibilities. Op Amp design is trivial, in comparison to determining precise causality 1:1 cause = effect. Human interaction is consists of both linear & non linear interactions.

                    The linear interactions are based on our social programming, non linear interactions are quite different, desires, drives, motives, religion, and many other social constructs..

                    I believe it is hard to gage any man or president properly.

                    Al Gore invented the internet after all???

                    The Internet came about long before browsers allowed joe six pack to share his beer bong technology with others. DOD

                    I will stop, before I blow a jk flip flop.

                    If you know what IEEE is, without looking it up. Reply!
                    Last edited by Zaroku; 12-21-2015, 06:57 AM.

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by Mukuro View Post
                      Didn't you just blame Reagan for black people being in prison for doing drugs? Don't get me wrong, our drug laws are imbecilic, but it is convenient to ignore the agency black people have taken in their own undoing.

                      My choice is choice 3. Black people, like all other people, are perfectly capable of excelling in society by focusing on family, education, and hard work like every successful minority in this country. That is the pathway. Each generation will be better off than the one before it. The best way to make sure a vast majority of black people stay locked in their cycle of poverty and crime is to subsidize it and make excuses for it. Treat them as exceptional and hold them to a lower standard.
                      That's great, but it doesn't address the question of "WHY". I get it that you want black people to succeed, not be under the poverty line, lowest graduation rate in the country, highest drug convictions, violence, teen pregnancy etc...

                      Great, we agree on that. My question is WHY IS IT HAPPENING. You can't give me an answer because you don't want to admit the obvious. Either you think black people can't achieve these things, or there are other factors that are causing these things.

                      It's one or the other.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP