Originally posted by SpeedKillz
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How is ray Leonard beter than mayweather??
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by junior gong View PostActually, that was worse, but I think it may have been tounge in cheek...at least I hope it was.
Originally posted by studentofthegam View PostShhh. I wont tell anyone u said that. LOL. Yeah Hagler is huge so potshots are his only choice. I am a big fan of Hagler but in all his big fights he chose to fight and stalk rather than box and move. Advantage Mayweather.
Comment
-
Originally posted by junior gong View PostHahaha...Yeah, just like taking candy from a baby.
it doesnt actually matter, but I didnt STATE that, but I also didnt disagree with the poster who did state it, cause it has truth to it. you should watch as many of his fights as you can, then get back to me, k?
Comment
-
hearns is a very possible win for floyd, so is hagler and duran because of the speed difference not saying floyd wins easy just potshots hit move, hit move not a entertaining fight but a possible win, yes!
but Leonard no he wouldn't win that fight, i just don't see how to big and the same skills as floyd just not the same defense but leonard has more offensive skills than floyd.
out of the four it's unfair to compare floyd to leonard a more better comparison is floyd ,duran and yes duran has a better resume.
Comment
-
Originally posted by illmaticfighter View Posthearns is a very possible win for floyd, so is hagler and duran because of the speed difference not saying floyd wins easy just potshots hit move, hit move not a entertaining fight but a possible win, yes!
but Leonard no he wouldn't win that fight, i just don't see how to big and the same skills as floyd just not the same defense but leonard has more offensive skills than floyd.
out of the four it's unfair to compare floyd to leonard a more better comparison is floyd ,duran and yes duran has a better resume.
Comment
-
[QUOTE=junior gong;12721430]Possibly a more ridiculous statement than the OP.[uQUOTE]
Lets chat. Im looking at key points. The main advantage Leonard has on Floyd is size and power. He used neither to beat Dirane or Hagler. He used his feet. Potshots and quick powerless flurries. Those to me sound like things Floyd could do. I still thought Hagler won but its a W on the books for Ray. None of that sounds ridiculous to me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by illmaticfighter View Posthearns is a very possible win for floyd, so is hagler and duran because of the speed difference not saying floyd wins easy just potshots hit move, hit move not a entertaining fight but a possible win, yes!
but Leonard no he wouldn't win that fight, i just don't see how to big and the same skills as floyd just not the same defense but leonard has more offensive skills than floyd.
out of the four it's unfair to compare floyd to leonard a more better comparison is floyd ,duran and yes duran has a better resume.
Comment
-
people rate ray based on duran hagler and hearns... and money may hasnt fought that kind of competition, i think people overrate ray ray at times but i cant dispute that argument and floyd is my fav boxer! floyd did alot of things better than ray and vice versa, ray was bigger and came up in the glory years so most people will give him the edge
Comment
-
Originally posted by illmaticfighter View Posthearns is a very possible win for floyd, so is hagler and duran because of the speed difference not saying floyd wins easy just potshots hit move, hit move not a entertaining fight but a possible win, yes!
but Leonard no he wouldn't win that fight, i just don't see how to big and the same skills as floyd just not the same defense but leonard has more offensive skills than floyd.
out of the four it's unfair to compare floyd to leonard a more better comparison is floyd ,duran and yes duran has a better resume.
Comment
Comment