Why or why not?
If Golovkin beats Charlo, is it a better win than Murray, Macklin or Geale?
Collapse
-
Yep, why??? He is clearly the more technical, younger and better fighter
Murrays claim to fame is losing a close fight to an undersized, old Martinez
Geale-Beat Sturm(who never beat anyone worth a damn) and who else?
Macklin?? LMFAO -Charlo's 1st fight at 160 knockd this guy out..literally who the hell did he ever beat? -
Sturm whooped oscars ass better than Floyd did that’s a fact LarryYep, why??? He is clearly the more technical, younger and better fighter
Murrays claim to fame is losing a close fight to an undersized, old Martinez
Geale-Beat Sturm(who never beat anyone worth a damn) and who else?
Macklin?? LMFAO -Charlo's 1st fight at 160 knockd this guy out..literally who the hell did he ever beat?Comment
-
Yes, just because Charlo is very highly rated and peaking.
Murray is about the closest but Charlo is betterComment
-
He actually did. I felt Sturm beat Oscar 8-4 and Oscar beat Floyd 7-5. Even Floyd SR said as much.. That was also a closer to prime version of De La Hoya too. All he did after that was get KO'd by Hopkins and fight once in three years.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Whatever one may think about DLH he was a very good fighter but he wasn't much once he moved up to 160lbs. I don't give a lot of credit to Floyd or Pac for beating a way past his prime DLH. While I thought Floyd beat DLH it wasn't one of his better performances.Comment
Comment