Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bigger hypejob Pacquiao, Golovkin, Broner, Mora or Lomachenko?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    I would say canelo

    Comment


    • #12
      Pacquiao, GGG and Loma aren't hype jobs. They are great champions that deserve every bit of praise they get. Broner was a carefully matched hype job for a while until he fought better fighters and was shown not to be as good as many said he was. After three ass kicking defeats he is not so highly regarded. Mora isn't a hypejob because he wasn't that good and few people ever hyped him up at any time. Let's face it, you have lousy taste in boxers. You thought Rios was going to KO Pacquiao with a left jab and you think Horn is the pound for pound king. Just because you don't like high quality champions like Loma, Pacquiao and GGG doesn't make them hype jobs. It just makes you a poor judge of boxing talent.

      Comment


      • #13
        id say its a tie between golovkin and broner here

        Comment


        • #14
          At what point in his undefeated career did GGG crumble? When did Loma crumble? Pacquiao fought a long time against many good and great fighters. He lost a few times and had many great wins. Crumble your negative ass out of here.

          Comment


          • #15
            Broner, not even close.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by hectari View Post
              Which boxer was hyped up but crumbled on the biggest stage?


              Manny pacquiao
              Ggg
              Adrien bronee
              Sergio mora the latina snake
              Or lomachenko?
              who ever hyped up Mora

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Julia Slobberts View Post
                Mora was hyped up big at one point??
                No he never was at any time. In fact he actually over achieved when he beat Forrest in an upset.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Clenelo definitely.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by chrisJS View Post
                    Yeah, that's bizarre. He's probably the consensus #1 ranked p4p fighter and he's won his biggest fights without even losing 10 seconds.

                    Pacquaio being a "hype job" who's "failed" also shows severe lack of boxing knowledge and basic intelligence levels. He's one of the greatest fighters in modern history. He's defeated some all-time greats, hall of famers and he's the signature win for three all-time greats - Marquez, Morales and Mayweather. He was also borderline finished for the last one too.
                    Again with this "finished" garbage.

                    I'll ask the same question you ignored last time.

                    How can a fighter be finished if they go on to beat Top 10 fighters and Top 5 P4P fighters?

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
                      Again with this "finished" garbage.

                      I'll ask the same question you ignored last time.

                      How can a fighter be finished if they go on to beat Top 10 fighters and Top 5 P4P fighters?
                      There's really no such thing as p4p but he'd already handled Bradley easily in 2012 so he had his number and actually had a harder time in 2014 and 2016. Name the other p4p top 5 fighter he beat? Rios, Algieri, Vargas were not p4p in mine or anybodies rankings surely?

                      There's many cases of once great fighters scoring a win when clearly past their best. Pacquaio was ended as a great fighter in 2012. It's in common sense and it's in the performances.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP