How can anyone have Crawford #1 P4P when his best win is Postol?

[j.razor]

Canelo should be p4p #1

I've been saying that since S.O.G. retired.

[j.razor]

Basically just an undercover GGG hate thread?

Acting like Golovkin was some hypejob when he arguably beat your p4p #1 twice (if it's Canelo for you, I'm assuming it is)

But yeah I have Canelo at 1 because of Resume and GGG also top 5 because of his fights with Nelito

Don't nobody need to cover up the fact that Triple L is a hype job.

[j.razor]

You can get people to overate you by looking exceptional beating bums, look at ggg. Not that im saying Ggg has best bums.
Because Ggg is probably no1. Lomo is there or thereabouts. Crawford is up there also as is nelo and the little jap. NO, not tenshin.

If you got Triple L "probably no.1" & l0m0 at no.2 then you better have Tenshin at no.3

[j.razor]

canelo number 1? wtf? lol is either loma or usyk no other way around it

Cut it out, Nelo has been #1 P4P since S.O.G. retired.

[j.razor]

Canelo blatantly lost the first GGG fight and arguably the second, how can he be number 1?

Fuk p4p

You blatantly lying, Triple L lost to Jacobs & Nelo twice.

[DuckAdonis]

Don't nobody need to cover up the fact that Triple L is a hype job.

For being a hypejob he did so good vs your guys p4p #1 that less than 10% if Boxing Media had your p4p #1 Canelo winning vs him in 2 fights.

[IronDanHamza]

Crawford is the biggest fraud "P4P #1" in a long time. Not even in my top 10 p4p this guy is a paper champ.

A paper champ that cleaned out 2 divisions?

[j.razor]

Crawford is the biggest fraud "P4P #1" in a long time. Not even in my top 10 p4p this guy is a paper champ.

Bud is in the top 5. The biggest fraud was Triple L.

[j.razor]

Most felt he lost both GGG fights, in fact everyone felt he lost fight I. GGG is considered by those that put Canelo as #1 as a bad fighter or mediocre at best. Canelo also has a few failed drug tests and highly debatable decision vs. Lara. Do you think he possesses more skills and overall talent than Crawford, Lomachenko or Usyk? Would they struggle and go life and death getting debatable decisions with someone as average GGG at this point in their careers?

Canelo has just never distanced himself against his best opponents and his signature win is also a decision most disagreed with against a fighter many say is bad. For Crawford, Gamboa or Postol would be considered about equivalent as Lara or old Cotto and Crawford dominated far more impressively. Don't bring Mosley up either because that Mosley is worth less than Horn. That Mosley was KO'd by Bumdine.

You work for bob....Nelo is #1 P4P & beat Triple L twice. Stop fakin' da funk chris (a name the devil also uses....)

[j.razor]

For being a hypejob he did so good vs your guys p4p #1 that less than 10% if Boxing Media had your p4p #1 Canelo winning vs him in 2 fights.

You said it.. "boxing Media"

http://cdn.bleacherreport.net/images...jpg?1307042750