Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Bob Arum: Wilder-Fury Rematch - Not Until February 2020
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Detroit29 View PostWhy does Wilder have to sign a 3 fight deal to DAZN to get the AJ fight? That fight can happen WITHOUT Wilder signing the 3 fight deal. AJ isn't even signed to DAZN so why should Wilder? Did Fury have to sign with PBC to fight Wilder? Hearn and Arum are the ONLY 2 saying Wilder HAS TO sign to their platforms to get a fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pigeons View PostAh yes, Fury's manhood is preserved by Anthony Joshua. Very masculine.
By the way, 113-113.
Comment
-
Originally posted by doom_specialist View PostHe doesn't, but a $120M deal that can be hammered out in 2-3 years is still good money, considering that these guys are supposed to be prizefighters. You get $120M regardless of if you get Joshua or not, which is why I said the deal itself was legit. I did also note that Joshua's side was still holding up the fight, demanding that Wilder have 3 other fights first.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boksfan View PostBeyonce Wildher is ducking fat Fury by staying with Showtime. What a pathetic duck Beyonce Wildher is!
Comment
-
Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View PostWhat lies have I posted?
Comment
-
Originally posted by john l View PostSo was 50mil$ deal was it not??
All of that notwithstanding, Hearn offered a Mayweather level contract (assuming there's a percentage) that would culminate in Wilder getting what he wants within 2-3 years. If I'm Wilder, I look at the money offered, look at Hearn's heavyweight stable, then immediately agree to the offer. Saying that he's as bad as Joshua is extreme taking into account that he would no doubt have to fight 3 other people first, but it was a pretty cushy way to a unification fight. If it included 30% or more back end with the guarantees, I absolutely would have taken that deal. Time is money too.
Comment
-
Originally posted by doom_specialist View PostIt absolutely was, considering that Joshua got exactly what he wanted, and wouldn't have had to fight a bunch of PBC heavyweights first. Wilder's team met Joshua's ridiculous demand, only for him to then say he would rather fight at home for less money "for the fans", and that personally constituted a duck in my eyes. Especially so when you factor in that Joshua is fighting in America after making such a thing seem impossible when Wilder was trying to lure him here.
All of that notwithstanding, Hearn offered a Mayweather level contract (assuming there's a percentage) that would culminate in Wilder getting what he wants within 2-3 years. If I'm Wilder, I look at the money offered, look at Hearn's heavyweight stable, then immediately agree to the offer. Saying that he's as bad as Joshua is extreme taking into account that he would no doubt have to fight 3 other people first, but it was a pretty cushy way to a unification fight. If it included 30% or more back end with the guarantees, I absolutely would have taken that deal. Time is money too.
Comment
Comment