41 years old Klitschko vs 38 years old Ortiz - who is a better fighter?

[Szef]

Vote and discuss

[Make U Cry]

Ortiz was on PEDS for most of his career. He couldn't use them against Wilder and got knocked out.

Wlad was actually a legit ATG champ who ruled the division for a decade.

Night and day.

[Laddie_Loc]

It's clearly Wlad.

A lot of ******s on this Forum though, so expect a Poll - If one is Made - to be Close.

[Kezzer]

As said above. Not really even worth a discussion.

[redmish]

Proven vs unproven, simple as that. Not to mention the shape klitschko was in. Good win but let's not get carried away.

[HeadShots]

Ortiz would knock Wlad out Corrie Sanders style.


bad match up. more skiled. better defense. Straight left down the pipe + KO power + Wlad fragile chin.

[CLUE]

One has been figured out before, knocked down multiple times, KO'ed before, coming off a loss, on the decline, and was on a two year lay off.

vs

A guy who is a undefended fighter, who has never been figured out, and is the most technical HW in the division.

[Cutthroat]

We've seen Wlad vs a southpaw in Sanders, there is a reason why he didn't rematch him. Ortiz would beat any version of Wlad.

[Cutthroat]

One has been figured out before, knocked down multiple times, KO'ed before, coming off a loss, on the decline, and was on a two year lay off.

vs

A guy who is a undefended fighter, who has never been figured out, and is the most technical HW in the division.

/thread....

[Boksfan]

Hall of famer Klitchko is superior to Ortiz.