Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: WBA Defends Miguel Cotto, Feels WBC Made Mistakes

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    The WBAs probably thinkn about throwing up one of their made up belts for this fight

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
      According to their own rules, they don't recognize the WBA champion.

      Which is why they don't rank Wladimir Klitschko in their top 10.

      http://wbcboxing.com/wbceng/Rules/WB...anuary2014.pdf

      But..... it looks like either HBO or K2 made it worthwhile for the WBC to conveniently ignore their rules and recognize/rank/install Golovkin as mandatory.

      It appears that it was HBO.

      Now that you know this, do you care?

      Or was my reply as much of a waste of time as your question ?

      #WeBeCrooks

      #Golovkinslegacydoe

      #tiptoeingthroughthetulips
      I know you're trying to be clever, but the notion that they are somehow breaking their rules by enforcing GGG as mandatory is not correct. Why not actually read (and comprehend) the document you've referenced?

      Specifically here:

      Special Bout Sanction(s). Under special circumstances, including but not limited to as a bout involving an elite contender, a champion of another organization, a match or tournament that the WBC determines in its sole discretion would be in the best interests of boxing, or any other applicable special circumstance, the WBC may order and/or sanction any such bout, or each associated tournament bout, as either a voluntary or mandatory defense under such terms and conditions as the WBC may impose in its sole discretion, and may order that any such special bout take precedence over and occur prior to any previously designated mandatory defense
      As you've clearly misread or misunderstood what the WBC rules mean, i'll explain it to you. A champion of another organisation (like GGG with WBA/IBF) may be designated mandatory under such terms (interim champion with step aside agreements until K2 want to enforce) the WBC sees fit.

      Don't like it? Tough, the WBC have broken no rules. Why haven't they done this for Wladimir Klitschko? He probably hasnt requested it to happen, but he's in a position to ask for it. The fact they don't do it often isn't the rule, it's just the norm.

      It's one thing to disagree with the politics of the sport, but the fact your entire existence on this forum, and your subsequent ramblings which are proven to be incorrect, are all based on your bias against a certain fighter. That's a desperately sad position to take..

      Comment


      • #33
        Shame on me for not reading the article and just the title on this one but if these sanctioning bodies are going to start bashing one another, then its time to start over or get rid of them. WBA has no business talking about another sanction when they got a champ for every region in the world. They need to get back to basics. Or fighters need to stop paying all the fees. Cant go on!

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by paypayvay View Post
          you do realize that GGG is ranked by the WBC because he defeated former WBC interim champion Marco Rubio in a unification bout, right ?
          Good god.....

          Read the whole fkn thread again kid, and start from page 1.

          You do realise that it is not WBC policy to recognise the WBA champ, right ?

          Why do the WBC NOT rank Klitschko in their top10, you dumb cvnt ?

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by techliam View Post
            I know you're trying to be clever, but the notion that they are somehow breaking their rules by enforcing GGG as mandatory is not correct. Why not actually read (and comprehend) the document you've referenced?

            Specifically here:



            As you've clearly misread or misunderstood what the WBC rules mean, i'll explain it to you. A champion of another organisation (like GGG with WBA/IBF) may be designated mandatory under such terms (interim champion with step aside agreements until K2 want to enforce) the WBC sees fit.

            Don't like it? Tough, the WBC have broken no rules. Why haven't they done this for Wladimir Klitschko? He probably hasnt requested it to happen, but he's in a position to ask for it. The fact they don't do it often isn't the rule, it's just the norm.

            It's one thing to disagree with the politics of the sport, but the fact your entire existence on this forum, and your subsequent ramblings which are proven to be incorrect, are all based on your bias against a certain fighter. That's a desperately sad position to take..

            Go tell that to Klitschko f@ggot.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
              Good god.....

              Read the whole fkn thread again kid, and start from page 1.

              You do realise that it is not WBC policy to recognise the WBA champ, right ?

              Why do the WBC NOT rank Klitschko in their top10, you dumb cvnt ?
              The WBC doesn't rank champions of other organizations in the top 10 , but has the discretion to name them as mandatory challengers depending on the circumstances .

              the old version :

              3.7 Designation of Mandatory Challengers. The WBC shall always have the discretion to
              designate a mandatory challenger by:
              (a) ordering a final elimination bout of two qualified contenders;
              (b) designating a Qualified Challenger as the official mandatory challenger; or
              (c) ordering a unification bout with a champion of another organization recognized by
              the WBC.


              Can you read, moron ?


              Not only did Golovkin get his mandatory status by beating the wbc interim champion , but there is actually a precedent for the WBC designating champions from other organizations as mandatory challengers, most recently Kovalev .
              Klischko could easily get a mandatory status if he pays up the sanctioning fees .

              dumb fuks bitc*ing about sanctioning bodies forcing unifications now ?

              the new one from the very same link you posted :

              " 3.8 Special Bout Sanction(s). Under special circumstances, including but not limited to as a bout involving an elite contender, a champion of another organization, a match or tournament that the WBC determines in its sole discretion would be in the best interests of boxing , or any other applicable special circumstance, the WBC may order and/or sanction any such bout, or each associated tournament bout, as either a voluntary or mandatory defense under such terms and conditions as the WBC may impose in its sole discretion, and may order that any such special bout take precedence over and occur prior to any previously designated mandatory defense. "



              so please tell me again how the WBC broke their own rules by naming golovkin the mandatory challenger .
              Last edited by paypayvay; 11-26-2015, 03:20 PM.

              Comment

              Working...
              X
              TOP