let the kid earn his respect in the ring man
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Spence: Why surprised?
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by SkillspayBills View PostHe's more technically sound, faster, better combinations, better body work, better reflexes, and better defense. Anything else?
Comment
-
I'm not into this, "he's clearly one of the P4P best... but he hasn't fought good competition yet."
In this game, you don't award status until a guy fights the best. Otherwise, that's called "hype". We've seen no end of talented guys whose weaknesses only became apparent when fighting top comp.
I think Spence is going places but don't expect people to just give him credit before he's earned it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Banko Villas View PostWhy is it that people will be so surprised if Spence wins? Spence is clearly one of the best P4P fighters on the planet, far above the likes of Golovkin, with the only problem being that Spence has not fought too good opposition yet. He will beat Brook and he will do it easier than Golovkin did (Golovkin got uppercutted into a state of jellylegs, lol). Spence will spark out Brook, Pacquiao, basically any of the small guys. Even Thurman is scared of the kid. He did not want to fight him even if it made him a rich man (by giving him a Mayweather fight).
If GGG hadn't broken Brook's face a few months ago, I'd have Brook winning handily.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Banko Villas View PostWhy is it that people will be so surprised if Spence wins? Spence is clearly one of the best P4P fighters on the planet, far above the likes of Golovkin, with the only problem being that Spence has not fought too good opposition yet. He will beat Brook and he will do it easier than Golovkin did (Golovkin got uppercutted into a state of jellylegs, lol). Spence will spark out Brook, Pacquiao, basically any of the small guys. Even Thurman is scared of the kid. He did not want to fight him even if it made him a rich man (by giving him a Mayweather fight).
Comment
-
Originally posted by whirlout View Post"Clearly one of the best Pound for Pound" but "has not fought too good opposition yet". U do know that there has to be a correlation between those two statements before you can make that claim
Comment
-
-
You can't be "clearly P4P" when you haven't even beaten a top 5 guy in your division yet. That's nutty talk bro lol. And I'm the cat calling P4P the dumbest thing smart boxing fans talk about, but for sure there are some minimum rules to even dummy P4P talk.
And hey man I'm curious about how good Spence is realllllllllly myself, but he still gots to prove it in the ring. This is kinda like the Floyd vs Genaro Hernandez fight in that way to me. Or even more recently like Joshua vs Klitschko. Everyone knew Floyd & Joshua had some talent, but was it enough talent vs that high a caliber guy? This is a situation very much the same in my eyes & I can't wait to actually see what goes down.
Comment
Comment