I don't know why there's nothing about this in the UK papers. It is absolutely insane.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Tyson Fury Pleads With UKAD To Render Decision on His Career
Collapse
-
If i remember correctly Tyson can't fight because of his mental health excuse, not the failed test. Which is why Hughie is allowed to fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by //// View Poststill for the cocaine?
no consistency in boxing, just all over the place, you might get a year off for asthma medication, 5 minutes off for anabolic steroids, 538.41 days for cokeEntering the scheduled rematch, there were many questions about possible performance-enhancing drug use hanging over Fury, although not in regards to the fight last year against Klitschko. In a UKADA drug test, Fury tested positive for the banned steroid Nandrolone in an earlier fight, even though, for reasons still unclear, the results did not come to light until June, well after he had beaten Klitschko.
Comment
-
Originally posted by fvanesbeck View PostIn theory, could he not still fight outside Britain if it's just a UKAD ban?Originally posted by GriffTannen View Postif he was serious he would have been training already.. is he not allowed to fight in america or any other country?
Fury had his licence revoked because he was ruled unfit to compete for mental health reasons and because he admitted to using coke. That then became bound in with another UKAD charge .. he refused to take a UKAD test last year because he said he didn't trust them not to stitch him up again. And refusing to take a test counts as a failed test.
So far as I understand it, Fury is using his mental health issues as a defence against the charge of refusing to take another UKAD PED test, and that will be ruled on at the same time, and by the same tribunal, as as the original nandrolone abuse charge, which Hughie Fury is also charged with.
I guess he could move abroad and get a licence in another country, because UKAD and the BBBoC only have jurisdiction in the UK.
Tony Thompson didn't lose his US licence after being banned for 2 years by UKAD and was able to fight anywhere except in the UK.
Comment
-
Originally posted by cameltoe View PostHis mental health, or lack of it, is more to blame for him not fighting.
However, this should have been wrapped up months ago. Incompetence and needless bureaucracy no doubt.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pigeons View PostWhen was Hughie Fury's UKAD hearing held? He was charged with the same doping offense as Tyson. I never saw any reports regarding the completion of his hearing or the result that was rendered. Was Hughie's hearing ever held, and if not, is he being allowed to fight for a title on Saturday with a pending drug trial still looming?Originally posted by Pigeons View Post
He is able to fight now because a court judge ordered UKAD to lift their provisional ban on him and Tyson last year, and Hughie didn't then go on to get himself banned for something else, like Tyson did.
2 comments on the info you posted .. Fury did have a sample flagged while training for his first fight with Wlad, but it didn't "only come to light" after the fight had happened. UKAD knew all about it at the time, but only decided that it merited a charge of nandrolone abuse 15 months later.
Fury was popped for cocaine by VADA, not UKAD, so that won't figure in the UKAD hearing he's talking about. What will happen there is ... IF he gets his licence back VADA will have to decide whether his use of coke was recreational or designed to give him an edge in the fight, then decide whether to charge him with PED abuse or not.Last edited by kafkod; 09-18-2017, 05:40 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ashadam View PostNothing wrong with him they made that up after getting caught taking drugs again.
Comment
Comment