...yet Mayweather-Mosley was way more exciting then Pacquiao-Clottey. How come?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pacquiao-Clottey and Mayweather-Mosley were both one sided dominating performances...
Collapse
-
-
Because Clottey was just an Arum pawn there for a paycheck.
Also Clottey is not on the level of Shane Mosley. It's more entertaining to see a great fighter and hall of famer getting dominated, then a guy who wasn't even there to win.
Comment
-
Originally posted by flexxx145 View PostBecause SSM and PBF both tried for the KO. Manny was content to beat on Clottey's elbows all night. Clottey was just happy not to get KO'd and collect his check.
Comment
-
This is because Mosley is an elite fighter who brought out the best in Floyd because Floyd respected him. Clottey was just happy to get a payday, He's a B minus fighter at best. I mean he lost to all of the top guys he fought (Baldomir, Margarito, Pacquiao, Cotto) and only barely beat Judah
Comment
-
Originally posted by gongin View PostThey tried but both failed ...The sided domination was pac-clottey.Clottey admit after the fight that he cannot open up or he got KO.Unlike shane who almost kO mayweather...funny **** is Floyd seems panic after those blows in the 2nd round.He dont know what to do ..lol
Sounds more to me that you're the one who doesn't have a ****ing clue.
Comment
-
Clottey is a defensive first fighter who retreats in his shell when he's in trouble. He offered Manny no visible target where he could hit him flush and thus make for an exciting fight with the possibility of a KO.
While Floyd was hitting Shane at will with precise clean shots which looked more impressive than Manny beating a human punchbag who offered no resistance other than covering up.
Comment
Comment