Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Golovkin: If I KO'd Jacobs, I Would Not Be Getting Canelo Fight!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View Post
    There is no negotiating when it comes to a purse bid...and they had to agree to terms 15 days after the Khan fight or a purse bid would be ordered. That simple.
    There's no negotiating on the purse, PPV split is something else.

    Comment


    • Cantnela and LLL are BOTH *****es.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
        Where does it say they negotiated the split? It says they agreed to it because Golovkin was the interim champ.



        It's the standard split for interim-champ fights. What everyone has been telling you.

        YOU WERE WRONG.
        It says the purse split was negotiated in Feb last year. Time to change your name again, loser.

        Or you could just stop lying and spinning, I guess.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by kafkod View Post
          It says the purse split was negotiated in Feb last year. Time to change your name again, loser.
          Part of the deal set forth, and agreed to by everyone involved, stipulated that if no agreement was reached, then a purse bid would be set. And instead of the standard 75/25 split in favor of the defending champion, in this case, it was set at 55/45 because of Golovkin’s standing as the WBC interim champion (a distinction he earned by walloping Marco Antonio Rubio back in Oct. of 2014).



          And right here may have been the biggest problem.



          While De La Hoya had stated that perhaps a 90-10 split would be offered to Golovkin beforehand – which was nothing more than posturing on his end – there was no way Alvarez going to agree to that WBC-mandated financial split.

          http://ucnlive.com/canelo-golden-boy...-on-the-clock/

          Mandated ******.... "75/25" though

          Comment


          • Originally posted by kafkod View Post
            It says the purse split was negotiated in Feb last year. Time to change your name again, loser.

            Or you could just stop lying and spinning, I guess.
            The purse bid split wasn't negotiated in February.


            Spin, spin, spin, lie, lie, lie. That's all you do.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
              The purse bid split wasn't negotiated in February.


              Spin, spin, spin, lie, lie, lie. That's all you do.
              Yes .. you are!

              Comment


              • Originally posted by kafkod View Post
                Yes .. you are!
                The article says it was mandated. Logic says it's mandated, why would he agree to a 55/45 split if like you claimed it's 75/25?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Unsuspected View Post
                  When Golovkin and his people kept talking about the big fight that was eluding him they meant the one with any star naturally smaller than him like Mayweather and Alvarez. If he was really starving for that "big" fight, why didn't he take the initiative into his own hands and move up to fight Ward at 168? You know, the same thing he wanted all the 147 and 154 lbrs. to do. Oh, because Ward was too big and he wouldn't be the one with all the physical advantages. Enough with this garbage already. If he knocks out Alvarez it still won't prove he's as great as his hype because he has refused for several years to do what he demands all the others do for him. Ward would have schooled him at 168 and would do so even worse at 175. Despite all the pom-pom waving by the HBO shills and fan boys alike, repeatedly calling out smaller men coming up in weight is not something that will define anyone's greatness.
                  Yeah .. the great Ande Ward would never call for a smaller man to move up and fight him ... oh, wait ..

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
                    The article says it was mandated. Logic says it's mandated, why would he agree to a 55/45 split if like you claimed it's 75/25?
                    Honest to God mate .. if that's the best you can do .. why even bother?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by kafkod View Post
                      Honest to God mate .. if that's the best you can do .. why even bother?
                      You've been running around here chatting bollocks for the past year about no 55/45 split. This is all we get from you. Didn't you say you can admit when you're are wrong? Well........ go on.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP