Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

(Poll) Is Joe Fraizer Overrated?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    THe nays have it!


    by a landslide

    Comment


    • #82
      As a matter of fact, I think the existence of this thread is a good indication that he is underrated if anything.

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by SNVDoublePunch! View Post
        As a matter of fact, I think the existence of this thread is a good indication that he is underrated if anything.
        I think if anything its a good indication that he is rated exactly where he should be.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Post
          are you saying that those assumptions are not correct?
          yes im saying those assumptions arent correct.he was the hardest hitting heavy of the 70's for sure but there have been plenty of bigger punchers since george

          if joe took everything george had,he mightve made it a decent fight.fact is,alot of those punches george landed to seemed to be glancing blows

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by r.burgundy View Post
            yes im saying those assumptions arent correct.he was the hardest hitting heavy of the 70's for sure but there have been plenty of bigger punchers since george

            if joe took everything george had,he mightve made it a decent fight.fact is,alot of those punches george landed to seemed to be glancing blows
            none of those punches was "glancing-blows" like you try to insinuate, they all landed Flush starting with a devastating uppercut which nearly tore Joe`s head off, there was foul punches to the back of Frazier`s head and there was a right uppercut which lifted Frazier off the floor such was the power of Foremans punches, Legendary boxing reporters like Gil Clancy, Norman Mailer & George Plimton all claimed that those punches was the hardest punches ever in a boxing ring, Legendary IBHOF referee Arthur Mercante said Foreman was the hardest puncher he had ever seen, he also said that as he stopped the fight "Frazier was up and ready to go" which is an unbelievable testement to Joe Frazier... but i suppose to you they are all talking bull**** coz you know different yeah.

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Post
              none of those punches was "glancing-blows" like you try to insinuate, they all landed Flush starting with a devastating uppercut which nearly tore Joe`s head off, there was foul punches to the back of Frazier`s head and there was a right uppercut which lifted Frazier off the floor such was the power of Foremans punches, Legendary boxing reporters like Gil Clancy, Norman Mailer & George Plimton all claimed that those punches was the hardest punches ever in a boxing ring, Legendary IBHOF referee Arthur Mercante said Foreman was the hardest puncher he had ever seen, he also said that as he stopped the fight "Frazier was up and ready to go" which is an unbelievable testement to Joe Frazier... but i suppose to you they are all talking bull**** coz you know different yeah.
              these guys have to be trolls....from what i saw in the Foreman fights....Frazier had an iron chin an he did look ready when they stopped the fight.....those punches he took would have killed many men

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by r.burgundy View Post
                he was the hardest hitting heavy of the 70's for sure but there have been plenty of bigger punchers since george
                Name them so we can laugh at you.

                Poet

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Post
                  Holmes out for the 10 count vs Tyson
                  Lewis out for the 10 count vs Rahman
                  Actually Holmes wasn't counted out: The ref waived the fight off at the 3rd knockdown without giving a count.

                  Poet

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by r.burgundy View Post
                    yes im saying those assumptions arent correct.he was the hardest hitting heavy of the 70's for sure but there have been plenty of bigger punchers since george

                    if joe took everything george had,he mightve made it a decent fight.fact is,alot of those punches george landed to seemed to be glancing blows
                    George foreman-

                    Often thought of as the most powerful puncher in the history of the sport
                    , Foreman could easily break men’s bones with his punches. Once he hit his stride in the early 1970s, he developed the bad habit of not fearing his opponents, and thus only training
                    his power, not his endurance. When he took down Frazier in only two rounds, the world figured that he would go on to the end undefeated, since no one was tougher than Frazier.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by Ruby Robert View Post
                      foreman could dent a ball of silly putty with his punch.

                      while a real punchers fist would bounce off.

                      Sucessfull puncher? yes. Hardest? not even top 10.



                      Im curious what 10 heavyweight you have punching harder than George, and why?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP