Originally posted by BattlingNelson
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What's the point of allowing Islamic immigrants into non-Islamic countries?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by southpaw_07 View PostInteresting how brainwashed some people are. Talking about integration in a new country?
Why don't we talk about the Irish, French and British immigrants who first arrived to North-America a couple of hundred years ago?
Did they happily accept the existing culture of the Native Indians ?
Lets instead remember the genocide of the Native Indians and how they are a minority in their own country and in many places are living in reservations in order for them not to mix the the rest of the population.
America is not the white invader's country, remember that before you talk about modern day's immigration.Last edited by John Barron; 02-03-2018, 06:24 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by //// View PostHistory isn't dictated by things having a point or always moving forward — it's dictated by fertility rates.
There was no point in Byzantium, one of the most educated and cultivated civilizations in human history being wiped out & melted down by steppe hordes & the modern Anatolia/Turkey region still playing pathetic catch-up with what it was 600 years ago.
The Byzantines simply had such a low birth rate that ambitious men were forced to abandon their cultural boundaries bit by bit in order to prosper financially. When you are forced to rely upon foreigners to maintain your material/economic way of life rather than upon your own sons, short-sighted, nihilistic professionalism quickly becomes more advantageous than traditional bravery.
Feminine/traitorous males who are willing to auction off the creations of their ancestors become extremely wealthy/influential in this environment (this is the explanation behind the income paradox of the elite, North-Eastern American & North-Western European far-left — being disproportionately wealthy yet pretending to lust for all that is socialistic and third-world in order to remain marketable while selling the ground their people are standing on). Long before the capital was besieged, the Byzantine upper class had willingly sold everything else off and left their rural populations in squalor.
Barring some techno-political revolution designed to prevent advanced nations from regressing into low fertility/feminist ancestral auction houses (not going to happen in the US where they aren't even allowed to teach dysgenics in schools) this cycle will repeat itself until the most intelligent populations are totally extinguished and mankind as a species enters a long period of stagnation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Theodore View PostConsidering that Western Europe is now heavily in turmoil from constant terrorist attacks, gang rapes, grooming gangs, and a population that will not assimilate but wants to recreate their Islamic homelands. This group does not get along with anyone.
They don't bring anything of value. So what's the point of allowing them into Non-Islamic countries?Originally posted by rigondo View PostTo undermine Western civilization and exterminate white people.Originally posted by Tony Trick-Pony View PostNo country needs citizens who refuse to assimilate. They are not citizens. They are invaders.Originally posted by John Barron View Postpoint is so brainwashed white liberals can feel good about themselves and live out their buzzfeed fantasy of diversity. and of course this ******ed argument "exotic foods doe".Originally posted by Build That Wall View PostThey need to learn to assimilate or GTFO
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mushroom View PostI do think assimilation is a lot easier said then done. I mean here in the UK we have Europeans immigrant groups who often don’t assimilate and they are much more culturally and ethnically similar to Brits. For people coming from places that are vastly different it must be difficult.
Heck even when I lived in Canada I found myself gravitating to other Brits
Comment
-
Originally posted by southpaw_07 View PostInteresting how brainwashed some people are. Talking about integration in a new country?
Why don't we talk about the Irish, French and British immigrants who first arrived to North-America a couple of hundred years ago?
Did they happily accept the existing culture of the Native Indians ?
Lets instead remember the genocide of the Native Indians and how they are a minority in their own country and in many places are living in reservations in order for them not to mix the the rest of the population.
America is not the white invader's country, remember that before you talk about modern day's immigration.
Oh, and I forgot about Sweden's history of imperialism - please educate me!
Also, you must have a hard time reading and comprehending - this is about European countries - USA doesn't have a problem with Muslim immigration.
Spain conquered and colonized Central and South America; England North America. Spanish is a White European language, as is English. But that is a different conversation. This is about Muslim immigration to European countries, and the problems arising therefrom.Last edited by Cheek busting; 02-03-2018, 07:09 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mushroom View PostI do think assimilation is a lot easier said then done. I mean here in the UK we have Europeans immigrant groups who often don’t assimilate and they are much more culturally and ethnically similar to Brits. For people coming from places that are vastly different it must be difficult.
Heck even when I lived in Canada I found myself gravitating to other Brits
You were not hostile to Canada and their customs, laws, etc.
The wave of non-muslim immigrants are very small, and not large enough to cause fracture, and divide.
The muslim immigration wave is doing just that - they are openly hostile to Western secularism, and values.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Theodore View PostConsidering that Western Europe is now heavily in turmoil from constant terrorist attacks, gang rapes, grooming gangs, and a population that will not assimilate but wants to recreate their Islamic homelands. This group does not get along with anyone.
They don't bring anything of value. So what's the point of allowing them into Non-Islamic countries?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View PostThis is what I don't understand about white people from the west. You cheer on and approve of these interventions in Islamic countries then complain when the refugees want to come to your country after you've destroyed theirs. If you want refugees to stop coming to your country how about telling your government to stop intervening in their countries. Stop the wars, funding of terrorist, and weapons sales and you'll stop the flow of refugees. The solution starts at home.
Islam has been very aggressive in dealing with white Europeans. The Sunni & Shia gotta go toe to toe and resolve their issues by themselves.
We can't fix the world. Muslim countries need to show love to their fellow Muslims and take refuges in, but they don't! I wonder why? Maybe they know something we in the west do not know? It's interesting that the people they won't allow into their country.. are the very one's Obama was flying in regularly.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zaroku View PostI kinda doubt it.. Islam has been at war with Christianity for a long time. Of corse our interventions have caused a lot of problems, but Islam is definitely a problem. Christianity had its internal wars of reformation. Islam is still sorting out their internal issues. Back n the day, Christians just wanted to Muslims outta the holy land and the right to plunder.
Islam has been very aggressive in dealing with white Europeans. The Sunni & Shia gotta go toe to toe and resolve their issues by themselves.
We can't fix the world. Muslim countries need to show love to their fellow Muslims and take refuges in, but they don't! I wonder why? Maybe they know something we in the west do not know? It's interesting that the people they won't allow into their country.. are the very one's Obama was flying in regularly.
Comment
Comment