Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How Many Positive Posters Get Ran Off of Here By Negative Posters?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Chuckguy View PostI think posters who use the ignore rule are just poosies who can't take the heat.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pigeons View PostBy far the worst feature implemented on this site. You have guys that spam this forum with threads and then ignore anyone that disagrees with them in order to propagate an agenda and make it appear that everyone agrees with them.
The biggest issue I have with the forum is many posters can be very immature making it hard to debate in a sensible manner.
Ive never put anyone on ignore nor have I ever given anybody red K .
Comment
-
Originally posted by Reloaded View PostYes its abused, lots of ignore comes from guys that cannot compete with you so they put you on ignore so they can continue their rubbish unabated, having features like this a 2 way street, I prefer to duke it out than place somebody on ignore.
The biggest issue I have with the forum is many posters can be very immature making it hard to debate in a sensible manner.
Ive never put anyone on ignore nor have I ever given anybody red K .
Comment
-
Originally posted by anthonydavid11 View PostYes! I'm definitely looking into it! Kind of like the unfollow on Facebook. Kept a lot of friends on my page that would have definitely been gone.
Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View Post
I only ignore in three cases:- Someone who has no strong argument and resorts to personal attacking
- Someone who is overbiased or clearly rewriting history. Like if you think Judah didn't throw the Malignaggi fight.
- Golovkin fanatics. Meaning people who seem to think G is some sort of robot who should be facing welterweights because why not.
Other than that, I'm always game for a good boxing debate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by revelated View PostMy ignore list here is longer than when I was an active Twitter user. That's telling.
Quite convenient. It got tiring having to go through like 4 clicks deep to get to the function. Thanks for this.
I only ignore in three cases:- Someone who has no strong argument and resorts to personal attacking
- Someone who is overbiased or clearly rewriting history. Like if you think Judah didn't throw the Malignaggi fight.
- Golovkin fanatics. Meaning people who seem to think G is some sort of robot who should be facing welterweights because why not.
Other than that, I'm always game for a good boxing debate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by anthonydavid11 View PostHaha. I hear you, man. That's pretty much my point. Some say ignoring is running away, but I'm not. I've debated these same points and these posters same the same thing over and over with no validity. I quit responding but they STILL keep saying the same things. Why have my posts filled with that trash? I love a debate but I'm not joining in on a collective beating of the heads against the wall and then name calling. It's stupid.
But yes, I will not continue pointless arguments. Debates with sound arguments and no personal attacks? Absolutely.
Comment
-
Originally posted by revelated View PostThank you for reminding me, there's one other reason I've used ignore: people who say all Floyd does is run when he stands in front of everyone he's in the ring with just at range, yet defend Conor McGregor as "resetting" when he clearly turned tail and ran from Nate Diaz.
But yes, I will not continue pointless arguments. Debates with sound arguments and no personal attacks? Absolutely.
Comment
-
Comment