How Many Positive Posters Get Ran Off of Here By Negative Posters?
Collapse
-
-
Nah, I like the debates, man, but when a poster just trolls and trolls, I'd rather not see it. They're not making a valid argument or any kind of point at all. Why tie up the feed with that crap?Comment
-
Yes its abused, lots of ignore comes from guys that cannot compete with you so they put you on ignore so they can continue their rubbish unabated, having features like this a 2 way street, I prefer to duke it out than place somebody on ignore.
The biggest issue I have with the forum is many posters can be very immature making it hard to debate in a sensible manner.
Ive never put anyone on ignore nor have I ever given anybody red K .Comment
-
I used the ignore to get them out of the way since all they do is say the same things over and over, making no valid point and often dragging something from another thread. It's pointless and ******. I've never sent red K, though. Not going to go down that road.Yes its abused, lots of ignore comes from guys that cannot compete with you so they put you on ignore so they can continue their rubbish unabated, having features like this a 2 way street, I prefer to duke it out than place somebody on ignore.
The biggest issue I have with the forum is many posters can be very immature making it hard to debate in a sensible manner.
Ive never put anyone on ignore nor have I ever given anybody red K .Comment
-
My ignore list here is longer than when I was an active Twitter user. That's telling.
Quite convenient. It got tiring having to go through like 4 clicks deep to get to the function. Thanks for this.
I only ignore in three cases:- Someone who has no strong argument and resorts to personal attacking
- Someone who is overbiased or clearly rewriting history. Like if you think Judah didn't throw the Malignaggi fight.
- Golovkin fanatics. Meaning people who seem to think G is some sort of robot who should be facing welterweights because why not.
Other than that, I'm always game for a good boxing debate.Comment
-
Haha. I hear you, man. That's pretty much my point. Some say ignoring is running away, but I'm not. I've debated these same points and these posters same the same thing over and over with no validity. I quit responding but they STILL keep saying the same things. Why have my posts filled with that trash? I love a debate but I'm not joining in on a collective beating of the heads against the wall and then name calling. It's ******.My ignore list here is longer than when I was an active Twitter user. That's telling.
Quite convenient. It got tiring having to go through like 4 clicks deep to get to the function. Thanks for this.
I only ignore in three cases:- Someone who has no strong argument and resorts to personal attacking
- Someone who is overbiased or clearly rewriting history. Like if you think Judah didn't throw the Malignaggi fight.
- Golovkin fanatics. Meaning people who seem to think G is some sort of robot who should be facing welterweights because why not.
Other than that, I'm always game for a good boxing debate.Comment
-
Thank you for reminding me, there's one other reason I've used ignore: people who say all Floyd does is run when he stands in front of everyone he's in the ring with just at range, yet defend Conor McGregor as "resetting" when he clearly turned tail and ran from Nate Diaz.Haha. I hear you, man. That's pretty much my point. Some say ignoring is running away, but I'm not. I've debated these same points and these posters same the same thing over and over with no validity. I quit responding but they STILL keep saying the same things. Why have my posts filled with that trash? I love a debate but I'm not joining in on a collective beating of the heads against the wall and then name calling. It's ******.
But yes, I will not continue pointless arguments. Debates with sound arguments and no personal attacks? Absolutely.Comment
-
Yes, sir. Sound arguments I welcome all day long. They have even changed my mind in a few instances. What better reason to get on here?Thank you for reminding me, there's one other reason I've used ignore: people who say all Floyd does is run when he stands in front of everyone he's in the ring with just at range, yet defend Conor McGregor as "resetting" when he clearly turned tail and ran from Nate Diaz.
But yes, I will not continue pointless arguments. Debates with sound arguments and no personal attacks? Absolutely.Comment
-
Comment

Comment