Originally posted by New England
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Tyson Fury UKAD Hearing Has Been Postponed Due To Conflict
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Funky_Monk View PostIt was quite rational till you showed up
yeah, fury should be considered 100% clean after popping for nandrolone, an anabolic steroid. i'm just a hater! and this several year long process of a drug testing board pushing off sanctions to allow two brits to finish their careers doesn't look fishy at all!
the truth hurts. it really, really hurts. i'm just disappointed that it's taking so long for these two to get their licenses to box stripped and to be ridiculed in public for being cheaters.
Comment
-
Originally posted by New England View Postyeah, fury should be considered 100% clean after popping for nandrolone, an anabolic steroid. i'm just a hater! and this several year long process of a drug testing board pushing off sanctions to allow two brits to finish their careers doesn't look fishy at all!
the truth hurts. it really, really hurts. i'm just disappointed that it's taking so long for these two to get their licenses to box stripped and to be ridiculed in public for being cheaters.
It's undoubtedly dragged on for some considerable time by guess would be similar to previous comments that maybe Tyson Fury wasn't considered fit to stand in front of a hearing. Legitimately or otherwise.
Based on other UKAD activity there is no evidence I have seen to discredit them quite the opposite.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Funky_Monk View PostPerhaps we can drop the childish comments.
What's your understanding of the timeline?
I'm finding it hard to get reliable sources for this.
The timeline is very simple, this was kept secret until a tabloid reported it and it was then confirmed to be true they were under investigation for failed tests, now it has transpired their is a conflict of interest on their panel of deciding members and that to me suggests he may have been the one who was attempting to keep it quiet and the charges to be brushed away.
The guy was scheduled to face Klitschko and cited injury a day before the allegations came to the attention of team Klitschko, and naturally he played the medically unfit to stand trial card, a card he hopes won't see him sued for breach of contract. It's quite clear their is nothing wrong with the guy other than the fact he's a doping under educated prat.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ScottWeiland View PostI'd suggest if you don't like being punked don't leave yourself open to it with naive comments and statements yourself.
The timeline is very simple, this was kept secret until a tabloid reported it and it was then confirmed to be true they were under investigation for failed tests, now it has transpired their is a conflict of interest on their panel of deciding members and that to me suggests he may have been the one who was attempting to keep it quiet and the charges to be brushed away.
The guy was scheduled to face Klitschko and cited injury a day before the allegations came to the attention of team Klitschko, and naturally he played the medically unfit to stand trial card, a card he hopes won't see him sued for breach of contract. It's quite clear their is nothing wrong with the guy other than the fact he's a doping under educated prat.
Also it'd be considered confidential. That's different from what you are suggesting.
Comment
-
So looks like in February 2016 he tested positive with UKAD then on the 22 September 2016 he tested positive for cocaine.
There is so little detail available it would seem
Comment
-
Originally posted by New England View Postyeah, fury should be considered 100% clean after popping for nandrolone, an anabolic steroid. i'm just a hater! and this several year long process of a drug testing board pushing off sanctions to allow two brits to finish their careers doesn't look fishy at all!
the truth hurts. it really, really hurts. i'm just disappointed that it's taking so long for these two to get their licenses to box stripped and to be ridiculed in public for being cheaters.
Green sent.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Funky_Monk View PostIt'd be really helpful if we could try piece together an actual timeline. When the test was when it was found to be positive etc rather than speculation.
Also it'd be considered confidential. That's different from what you are suggesting.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Funky_Monk View PostSo looks like in February 2016 he tested positive with UKAD then on the 22 September 2016 he tested positive for cocaine.
There is so little detail available it would seem
Comment
Comment