Who ranks higher overall P4P: Marvin Hagler or Thomas Hearns

[Boxing56]

Who do you think ranks higher?

[Larry the boss]

Id say Hearns..he moved up and kept challenging himself

[hugh grant]

Off top of my head without thinking wouldn't it be hearns!?
Didn't he beat srl and Duran?

[soul_survivor]

I'd say Hagler. He was the better fighter, more skilled, stronger, better chin and exceptional achievements. But both are outright atgs.

[rr00676]

Have a hard time putting many ahead of hearns p4p...such a fkn freak at WW

[Larry the boss]

Off top of my head without thinking wouldn't it be hearns!?
Didn't he beat srl and Duran?

Leonard knocked Hearns out

[Tony Trick-Pony]

Hearns all the way. Hearns took on the stiffer competition.

[IMDAZED]

The criminally underrated Hearns

[j0zef]

Not sure how this is even a debate. Not only did Hagler beat Hearns, but his only real loss is a questionable decision against SRL. Hearns has plenty of unimpressive losses in his prime.

The whole "he challenged himself, he moved up" is a bull**** storyline. Dude was over 6 foot tall and "moved up" to MW in his mid 20s.

[Joe Beamish]

Hagler by miles. He whipped a lot of bad dudes including Hearns.

Hearns was a tremendous boxer and power puncher with a weak chin. Hagler had it all. Nothing lacking.