I can't think of one fighter in boxing history who people make more excuses for than Tyson.
The argument for Tyson vs Holyfield is that he was rusty and a shell of his former self after being released from prison even though he destroyed Frank Bruno even faster than he did in his first fight.
The argument for Tyson vs Lewis is he needed the money, a shell of his former self and was old even though Lewis was older than Tyson.
But what is the argument for losing to Buster? He destroyed Bruno and Williams in devastating fashion less than a year before getting KO'd by Buster. He was 23 years old and looked to be in great shape.
So what excuse is usually given for this loss?
The argument for Tyson vs Holyfield is that he was rusty and a shell of his former self after being released from prison even though he destroyed Frank Bruno even faster than he did in his first fight.
The argument for Tyson vs Lewis is he needed the money, a shell of his former self and was old even though Lewis was older than Tyson.
But what is the argument for losing to Buster? He destroyed Bruno and Williams in devastating fashion less than a year before getting KO'd by Buster. He was 23 years old and looked to be in great shape.
So what excuse is usually given for this loss?
Comment