That's ludicrous,GGG's style plays perfectly into Canelo's strengths. Shields said it himself that Canelo prefers an opponent that comes straight at him and that's what Golovkin is known for.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Lara's Coach: Canelo Does Not Have The Style To Beat Golovkin
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by nycsmooth View PostThe article said Canelo jumping up to 2 was even with the catch-weight to fight a
" difficult"fight with Jr... Chavez brings virtually nothing...
Lots of fighters have been beaten when climbing too much weight. I don't think that will be the case here, but it could happen.
Comment
-
Originally posted by T.M.T View Postevery word in your post is wrong. what world did you come from (TMT)
Comment
-
Originally posted by 123tommy View PostIf Canelo was going to avoid GGG than why fight for a lot less against a dangerous guy like Lemeiux? Saunders or Degale would make more sense financially and physically
Comment
-
Lara with his pure Cuban boxer background is like kryptonite to GGG's style imo. Lara has been begging for this fight for years for a reason. You want big fights Lara? Try not stinking out the joint whenever you're put on the world stage. Also, Lara-Williams was the worst robbery of the last 15-20 years.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shadoww702 View PostYou wouldn't but to be fair Chavez Jr. if MOTIVATED is better than BOTH Lemuix and Saunders. Lemuix lost to a career 154lber. And Andy Lee got TKO's by Chavez in 7 rounds. Saunders fought to an MD with Saunders. I would bet the FARM on Canelo to beat either one of those two.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DeadLikeMe View PostLara with his pure Cuban boxer background is like kryptonite to GGG's style imo. Lara has been begging for this fight for years for a reason. You want big fights Lara? Try not stinking out the joint whenever you're put on the world stage. Also, Lara-Williams was the worst robbery of the last 15-20 years.
Comment
-
Originally posted by j0zef View PostYes he does. Dude has absolutely no idea what he's talking about.
I particularly appreciated your explanation as to why you think Shields is way off. Very instructive.
Comment
Comment