Originally posted by Raggamuffin
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How does the IBF sanction Spence/Ocampo but not GGG/Vanes?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by larryxxx.. View PostCanelo failed and pulled out...SO WHY NOT FIGHT YOUR MANDO??? Then they even allowed the Vanes fight AS LONG AS GGG HANDLED HIS MANDO NEXT......HE DIDN'T
Larry, they stripped the man for not fighting a guy who had not beaten a top 50 guy, who had an undeserved ranking. They took his title! Foh...
I didn't know that the new rule: if your opponent in a super fight fails a drug test, fight your mando or be stripped. They didn't have Derevyanchenko fight for the right to even become an interim champion. They stripped the man who won his title fair and square in the ring and paid his sanctioning fees. Foh with your lunacy...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Illmatic94 View PostI'm confused now.
Ocampo a damn 100/1 underdog. Vanes was 30/1 when I checked on May 2nd.
Meaning Ocampo winning will be the biggest upset in boxing history. Finally eclipsing Tyson/Douglass.
and this mofo is a mandatory. How?
the IBF gotta explain this. I supported the stripping because Vanes had no damn business in that ring. but neither does Ocampo.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Raggamuffin View PostWTF is wrong with yall!!!???
Larry, they stripped the man for not fighting a guy who had not beaten a top 50 guy, who had an undeserved ranking. They took his title! Foh...
I didn't know that the new rule: if your opponent in a super fight fails a drug test, fight your mando or be stripped. They didn't have Derevyanchenko fight for the right to even become an interim champion. They stripped the man who won his title fair and square in the ring and paid his sanctioning fees. Foh with your lunacy...
Comment
-
Originally posted by NC Uppercut View PostHonestly, IBF doesn’t eff around like the rest of the ABC organizations...they don’t play the “interim “ game as hard as the rest
This is why we don't need these orgs anymore. That's why i use my own criteria when calling a fighter a champion. This is why I still stick to my lineal argument.
Comment
-
Originally posted by larryxxx.. View PostCanelo failed and pulled out...SO WHY NOT FIGHT YOUR MANDO??? Then they even allowed the Vanes fight AS LONG AS GGG HANDLED HIS MANDO NEXT......HE DIDN'T
Comment
-
Originally posted by Raggamuffin View Post**** their rules. Not coming at you. **** the IBF.
This is why we don't need these orgs anymore. That's why i use my own criteria when calling a fighter a champion. This is why I still stick to my lineal argument.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Raggamuffin View PostHow do you make the mandatory due when the guys he was supposed toi fight failed a test?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Raggamuffin View PostBut Redd, not coming at you, but who in the hell has he beat? Jorge Paez Jr...!!!???
I'm not bashing either guy over these fights but I think the thread feels like, "I'm going to try to seem fair so I'll give Spence a hard time too."
Comment
-
Alphabet title rankings suck, we all know this. GGG fans were blind to this while GGG was going through his mandatory fight reign and everyone else was displeased with his opponents. I don't care to see Spence vs Ocampo but at least Spence is 28 years old and not 35 fighting bum after bum.
Comment
Comment