Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Thomas Hearns vs. Julian Jackson at 154.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    I would go with Hearns as his reach and jab would pinpoint Jackson. Setting up the right hand for the finish. He had a lot more speed and was a much better boxer.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Anthony342 View Post
      So I take it Jackson is considered one of the best all time at 154? But would he be the best all time at that weight?
      I would say so

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by rudy View Post
        I would say so
        What about Mike McCallum, who was WBA champ at 154 from 1984-1988 and has a TKO win over Jackson?

        Comment


        • #14
          This one is too tough to call, so I have not spoken. Whose chin was more glassy? I believe Hearns'. Either one of these guys could be knocked cold with a harsh glare during staredown.

          Comment

          Working...
          X
          TOP