Dwyer Boxing: "David Haye has made a huge mistake in fighting Manuel Charr".

[billeau2]

Dwyer's the same guy that said the Guerrero fight would be tougher for Floyd than a Canelo fight. Of course, this was before the Canelo/Trout fight, then he changed his tune on that one.

He's been wrong on so many occasions, and literally picked every opponent against Matthysse ever since his Alexander "loss".

The guy is not credible at all. He's just well spoken, so people somewhat take him a little bit serious.

P.S. If you're black and the underdog, you're "severely underrated" according to Dwyer. Then when said fighter loses, he doesn't make a post fight video about it. Only when he's right, except for the Canelo/Trout fight, because he'd look like a moron if he didn't.

Thats Bull****... I listen to most of Dwyer's vids he is not a racist, thats a rumor. In fact he is a Klit fan.

I must say....This analysis he did on the Char Haye fight did make me do the palmslap though. I looked at the fight as he said and was going to post something to the effect of "Dwyer, did Char and Vitali fight twice? cause the vid I saw? did not look very competative and basically had Vitali bouncing Char around the ring."

Dwyer has some interesting observations he is not a moron, not a rascist and has a nice vibe. He has his faults for sure but honestly! people exxagerate. Its not right to call him out on stuff that is imagined

[Zano-24]

Dwyer's the same guy that said the Guerrero fight would be tougher for Floyd than a Canelo fight. Of course, this was before the Canelo/Trout fight, then he changed his tune on that one.

He's been wrong on so many occasions, and literally picked every opponent against Matthysse ever since his Alexander "loss".

The guy is not credible at all. He's just well spoken, so people somewhat take him a little bit serious.

P.S. If you're black and the underdog, you're "severely underrated" according to Dwyer. Then when said fighter loses, he doesn't make a post fight video about it. Only when he's right, except for the Canelo/Trout fight, because he'd look like a moron if he didn't.

Hes been doing post video's on the fights he called wrong. Which ones are you specifically talking about? Also, here we go with this black thing. If I recall he picked Pauilie to beat Broner...

[BUNGALOWS]

Hes been doing post video's on the fights he called wrong. Which ones are you specifically talking about? Also, here we go with this black thing. If I recall he picked Pauilie to beat Broner...

He always does that for a cherry pick fighter that he likes!!!

He tries to give reasons why the fight isn't a cherry pick by giving the underdog a huge chance at an upset, so the fighter doesn't look like a cherry picking pu$$y.

Ex. Floyd vs. Guerrero.

[Check_hooks]

Dwyer actually thinks that Bradley beat Pacquiao

Nuff said

[BUNGALOWS]

Thats Bull****... I listen to most of Dwyer's vids he is not a racist, thats a rumor. In fact he is a Klit fan.

I must say....This analysis he did on the Char Haye fight did make me do the palmslap though. I looked at the fight as he said and was going to post something to the effect of "Dwyer, did Char and Vitali fight twice? cause the vid I saw? did not look very competative and basically had Vitali bouncing Char around the ring."

Dwyer has some interesting observations he is not a moron, not a rascist and has a nice vibe. He has his faults for sure but honestly! people exxagerate. Its not right to call him out on stuff that is imagined

Let's put it this way. He thinks every black fighter that's an underdog should be the favorite, and he has no reason why they're ever the underdog.

The man would pick Bradley over GGG just for the hell of it.

I agree, I do like his videos when it doesn't have anything to pertain with a black fighter vs. a non black fighter, because chances are he'll discredit the non black fighter, and only give you reasons why the black fighter should win, and give you all the faults of the non black fighter.

I've seen enough of his videos to figure out his M.O.

[billeau2]

He always does that for a cherry pick fighter that he likes!!!

He tries to give reasons why the fight isn't a cherry pick by giving the underdog a huge chance at an upset, so the fighter doesn't look like a cherry picking pu$$y.

Ex. Floyd vs. Guerrero.

Why? what motivation exactly? I mean if he is a Black Panther.....well maybe he will favor the African American Fighter right? I mean as screwy as the charge is that Dwyer is rascist...At least we know what motivates a rascist! But Now Dwyer picks the cherries....SEE HOW STUPID YOU SOUND?

Dwyer attempts to beat the Casinos. He looks for "value" i.e. a way that the csinos judged wrong and give a gambler great value on a pick that is not particularly remote....

LIKE IT OR NOT Paulie fits that category, he has a chance and Dwyer is not the only one to say so. He is right and he is wrong sometimes....like everyone else who picks

[bravestone]

yes, what a horrible move to fight an unranked heavyweight for millions of pounds.

[BUNGALOWS]

Why? what motivation exactly? I mean if he is a Black Panther.....well maybe he will favor the African American Fighter right? I mean as screwy as the charge is that Dwyer is rascist...At least we know what motivates a rascist! But Now Dwyer picks the cherries....SEE HOW STUPID YOU SOUND?

Dwyer attempts to beat the Casinos. He looks for "value" i.e. a way that the csinos judged wrong and give a gambler great value on a pick that is not particularly remote....

LIKE IT OR NOT Paulie fits that category, he has a chance and Dwyer is not the only one to say so. He is right and he is wrong sometimes....like everyone else who picks

OK, Dwyer, I enjoy some of your videos, because you do know a bit about boxing, but please stop acting like a closet black panther whenever it's a black fighter vs. a non black fighter.

P.S. Can you shout me out in your next video?

[Zano-24]

He always does that for a cherry pick fighter that he likes!!!

He tries to give reasons why the fight isn't a cherry pick by giving the underdog a huge chance at an upset, so the fighter doesn't look like a cherry picking pu$$y.

Ex. Floyd vs. Guerrero.

He always talks trash about Broner though. He would down play Broner wins but at the same time claim he has skills.

[ROSS CALIFORNIA]

I disagree with him. I see this being a sure win for Haye.