what is Golovkin's claim to fame... ?
does he have genuine " name " achievements... ?
nope
well, what does he have... ?
two things...
* knocking out a string of cans
* equaling Hopkins middleweight record
the first item, knocking out a string of cans... whoop-de-shlt
David Lemieux knocked out a string of cans... WHOOP-DE-SHlT
the second item, equaling Hopkins middleweight record...
FACT: everyone knows that Golovkin defended the WBA junior title for his first 11 defences...
1) a junior title that did not even exist back when Hopkins was king
2) a junior title that even the WBA admit is rubbish... which is why they have pledged to remove it
WHOOP-DE-SHlT !!
there is literally nothing credible there... no real substance at all
so yea... avoiding a middleweight unification with Saunders cost Golovkin big-time... that is the only real achievement that was on Golovkin's radar... his legacy would be MUCH healthier becoming undisputed middleweight champ
oh well, not to be I guess
does he have genuine " name " achievements... ?
nope
well, what does he have... ?
two things...
* knocking out a string of cans
* equaling Hopkins middleweight record
the first item, knocking out a string of cans... whoop-de-shlt
David Lemieux knocked out a string of cans... WHOOP-DE-SHlT
the second item, equaling Hopkins middleweight record...
FACT: everyone knows that Golovkin defended the WBA junior title for his first 11 defences...
1) a junior title that did not even exist back when Hopkins was king
2) a junior title that even the WBA admit is rubbish... which is why they have pledged to remove it
WHOOP-DE-SHlT !!
there is literally nothing credible there... no real substance at all
so yea... avoiding a middleweight unification with Saunders cost Golovkin big-time... that is the only real achievement that was on Golovkin's radar... his legacy would be MUCH healthier becoming undisputed middleweight champ
oh well, not to be I guess
Comment