Originally posted by Royal Burnell
View Post
But it wouldnt matter because any boxer would get taken down by Sherk or Faber in MMA. Sherk has among the best takedowns in the sport and Faber is no slouch.
And life was wrestling is a little bit misleading. Sherk never really accomplished much in wrestling. His background was a high school wrestler, than he transitioned to MMA but he quit for 2-3 years to work construction because MMA failed to take off.
The fighters with the best wrestling credentials are the fighters who dont even have the best takedown defense in the sport. Liddell was only a collegiate wrestler and wasnt really that accomplished as a wrestler. He has fantastic takedown defense.
And GSP who is the best MMA wrestler in the sport started wrestling when he was 22. Sure hes trained with the Canadian National Wrestling team but his takedown defense isnt because of his wrestling ability. Its only a small part of it.
Even Joe Rogan said it himself when GSP fought Koscheck. GSP's takedown defense is so good because of his athleticism, reflexes, footwork. Athleticism plays a pretty large role in takedown defense. Look at Anthony Johnson in his fight against Speer. That guy wrestled for 2 years in high school and is primarily known as a striker who has quick hands. Johnson was stuffing every single takedown attempt from a pretty damn good wrestler in Speer. And Johnson wasnt doing so because of his mediocre wrestling background. He did so using his incredible athleticism.
Comment