Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Limey Lang

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Fooly Cooly View Post
    Clegg was never original, he's always been a dull English ****.

    Demise is just a ****.
    http://auntiefarr.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/fft4.jpg

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
      what i tell you about talking about boxing?

      quit it.
      Calzaghe ruined Lacy, but before that fight Lacy was a different fighter. Roldan is a misleading fighter because he had a lot of fights against decent opposition which means a lot of wins.

      People suddenly view fighters differently when they have 60+ wins.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Demise View Post
        Calzaghe ruined Lacy, but before that fight Lacy was a different fighter. Roldan is a misleading fighter because he had a lot of fights against decent opposition which means a lot of wins.

        People suddenly view fighters differently when they have 60+ wins.
        http://www.lolforumpictures.com/gtfo/gtfo5.jpg
        Last edited by Left Hook Tua; 09-03-2011, 08:21 PM.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
          You can't debate because you don't have the knowledge or understanding.

          I have simply made you look like a fool.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Demise View Post
            You can't debate because you don't have the knowledge or understanding.

            I have simply made you look like a fool.
            you were banned from talking about boxing in here after you didn't know who vic darchinyan was and when you got boxrec confused and didn't know hearns fought barkley twice.

            please follow the rules.

            thank you.

            Comment


            • Comment


              • Darchinyan, the Australian right?

                Comment


                • His rematch against Barkley is null, void. It's like Fenech-Nelson III.

                  Comment


                  • Also, can you please provide proof where I state that I didn't realise Hearns rematched Barkley?

                    But you can't.

                    That's a damn shame, try again Tua. You are but a small fish in a big lake.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Demise View Post
                      His rematch against Barkley is null, void. It's like Fenech-Nelson III.
                      ok.

                      let's pretend you didn't get boxrec confused and was talking about the 1st fight.


                      please explain 1. why you thought thomas hearns was shot by the time of the barkley fight and 2. why did you say "barkley was lucky to get the win" , when he knocked out hearns.

                      i'll let you talk about boxing just once to explain those 2.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP