i want in guys... a couple of 3rd place finishes last year with Yahoo Public Leagues... I was like 1st and 2nd and then got burned in the playoffs... lol...
i want in guys... a couple of 3rd place finishes last year with Yahoo Public Leagues... I was like 1st and 2nd and then got burned in the playoffs... lol...
anybody have any comments as to things that they DO NOT want to see in the scoring, structure, or otherwise?
i will take all requests/suggestions into account, but i may overrule some things. i have a particular way that i want to set up the league, so i want to weigh my preferences against some of yours.
39 yd FG and under - 3pts
40-49 yd FG - 4 pts
50+ - 5pts
XP - 1pt
Missed FG - (-)1pt
Individual defense
D
D
DE
DE
DB
DB
BN
BN
Individual defense actually separates great managers from average ones in my opinion. You have to understand both sides of the ball in that case. With team defenses, you just draft either Baltimore or Chicago and there's a monopoly on great defenses. Individual is also good because it helps balance out points (to a small degree), it gives you more people to root for, and it makes for a more complex league. I'm assuming that everyone here is a veteran manager.
The scoring for individual defense would look like this:
This format doesn't *generally* give your defense a ton of scoring power, but it does reward excellent defensive performances. There are many players who have standout performances on defense, it's just up to the manager to know who those players will be by checking out matchup strengths/weaknesses.
What does everyone think? Again, these are all possibly subject to change with good reasoning and respectful commentary.
39 yd FG and under - 3pts
40-49 yd FG - 4 pts
50+ - 5pts
XP - 1pt
Missed FG - (-)1pt
Individual defense
D
D
DE
DE
DB
DB
BN
BN
Individual defense actually separates great managers from average ones in my opinion. You have to understand both sides of the ball in that case. With team defenses, you just draft either Baltimore or Chicago and there's a monopoly on great defenses. Individual is also good because it helps balance out points (to a small degree), it gives you more people to root for, and it makes for a more complex league. I'm assuming that everyone here is a veteran manager.
The scoring for individual defense would look like this:
This format doesn't *generally* give your defense a ton of scoring power, but it does reward excellent defensive performances. There are many players who have standout performances on defense, it's just up to the manager to know who those players will be by checking out matchup strengths/weaknesses.
What does everyone think? Again, these are all possibly subject to change with good reasoning and respectful commentary.
Comment