Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

No More Abortion!!! (Well at least it should be)

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
    What part of artificial womb don't you understand?

    There is no labor, rather than kill be baby and take it out, the just take it out.

    Why are you obsessed with killing the baby?

    If the woman doesn't want the baby, fine, it can be taken out and put in an artificial womb, rather than be killed.
    And if she doesn’t want that? You act like it’s so simple as squat and poop it out. Why should she have to go through another unwanted procedure? Are you volunteering to raise all of those children? Everyone cries about killing babies, how many do y’all have under you care that are not biological to you? Do you even process what a child in the system go through? The cost of it? The human factor? No, clearly you don’t. So again worry about that actually affects you as this obviously doesn’t not unless you have a uterus...

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Don Pichardo View Post
      What does an artificial womb have to do with abortion? Are you trying to say that instead of an abortion to just take the zygote and transfer it to the artificial womb? I really hope that’s not what your proposing.
      Why not?

      How can you say abortion is a woman's choice?

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by turnedup View Post
        And if she doesn’t want that? You act like it’s so simple as squat and poop it out. Why should she have to go through another unwanted procedure? Are you volunteering to raise all of those children? Everyone cries about killing babies, how many do y’all have under you care that are not biological to you? Do you even process what a child in the system go through? The cost of it? The human factor? No, clearly you don’t.
        But when the father doesn't want it, you are OK with that then and making him pay for 18 years.


        Why shouldn't the father get a say?

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
          Just think of all the child support he would be getting from her.

          Beside, he should have the choice.

          Why would you support killing a baby instead of saving it?
          If born Can’t kill it. If inside it’s nothing but a fetus. Can’t survive without mother. Naturally there is a point where it can survive. So I wouldn’t propose later term abortions. M

          But to answer your question. Simply population control. Saving all these unwanted babies will only lead to our demise. The world can only support so many poeple. Why do you want to ultimately kill your kids or grand kids? What makes unborn fetus’ so special that they can’t be killed. I do not understand why you place so much importance in unborn fetuses. We humans aren’t special so why give a flying fuk about an unborn fetus?

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
            But when the father doesn't want it, you are OK with that then and making him pay for 18 years.


            Why shouldn't the father get a say?
            He has the easiest part of the job...does he not? Hell they’ve put men in fat suits to simulate just what a day to day pregnant woman goes through and most can’t last a full day..also it’s pretty fking simple to pause for a second and put on a condom. If you are laying with women without a condom that you wouldn’t want to start a family with...that’s on you.

            Im going to recommend a psychotherapist to deal with some of these issues you have with women..

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Don Pichardo View Post
              Lol. What Fuking father actually wants the baby. Gtfo. If a woman wouldn’t never ask for the baby a man would never bring it up. Lol. At least try to Be real.
              The professor talked about this in lecture today. We have Stanley v Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 (1972). In re Adoption of Baby Boy B., 394 S.W.3d 837 (Ark. 2012). In re Doe, 638 N.E.2d 181 (Ill. 1994). The Supreme Court case established equal protection to unmarried fathers in regards to parental rights, and the other two cases are of unmarried fathers successfully blocking adoptions of their children, after the mothers consented.

              Comment


              • #17
                abortions should be banned. these whores should be FORCED to have their babies and raise it. deadbeat broke whores disgust me.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
                  Why not?

                  How can you say abortion is a woman's choice?
                  Because she has to deal with it. We don’t have to do sh it but bust a nut inside her. If we do we assume the risk.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by GGG Gloveking View Post
                    The professor talked about this in lecture today. We have Stanley v Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 (1972). In re Adoption of Baby Boy B., 394 S.W.3d 837 (Ark. 2012). In re Doe, 638 N.E.2d 181 (Ill. 1994). The Supreme Court case established equal protection to unmarried fathers in regards to parental rights, and the other two cases are of unmarried fathers successfully blocking adoptions of their children, after the mothers consented.
                    Have you ever asked a woman to give you a baby? Once the baby is born it’s a different issue. Men don’t generally go around asking woman to hear them children. It’s us usually the other way around. What have a child love it to death. But I as sure fuk didn’t ask my wife for it.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
                      Fathers have to pay for their children and have no say.
                      Are you OK with that?

                      If so, why the double stander.

                      You do realise we got people going abroad and buying children and people paying people to rent their wombs so they have baby.
                      Fathers really do get the short end of the stick before the baby is born. As far as your measure, I would support the father being able to get an injunction compelling the mother to allow extraction of the fetus and transfer, at the father's expense. I do feel that it takes two to make a fetus, and to grant sole possession to the mother isn't equitable.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP