Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New documentary on Michael Jackson's crimes coming out, HBO and channel 4 to air

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Jackson paid $20 million to get them to drop the case after Jordan accurately described blotches on Michael Jackson's ***** and anus.



    Leading investigators and the nations #1 expert on abuse and false claims found the claims credible.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by Hype job View Post
      Jackson paid $20 million to get them to drop the case after Jordan accurately described blotches on Michael Jackson's ***** and anus.



      Leading investigators and the nations #1 expert on abuse and false claims found the claims credible.
      Next thing you know some 12 year old is gonna come out accurately describing how Mj's cum tasted and you'll still have people doubting he's a pedofile lol

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by Hype job View Post


        Latoya Jackson retracted her claims. Her ex husband had her drugged out and had her trying to extort her family for money

        Dr. Murray is a killer selling his story for money. The "Mike is a pedo" story will always sell but it has never held up in a court of law

        Not GUILTY!!!

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View Post
          Latoya Jackson retracted her claims. Her ex husband had her drugged out and had her trying to extort her family for money

          Dr. Murray is a killer selling his story for money. The "Mike is a pedo" story will always sell but it has never held up in a court of law

          Not GUILTY!!!
          $20 mill ensured that it didn't.

          He was going down in 93 and he knew it. That's why he settled.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by DARKSEID View Post

            give it up man!!!
            according to child sexual abuse consultant Bill Dworin, one of the lead detectives on the case, Jordan's description comported with the photos taken of Jackson's genitalia.[49] Dr. Richard Strick, who conducted the examination of Jackson's genitals, stated, "I was told later that the photos and description absolutely matched".[50] According to Sneddon in a 2005 memorandum in People v. Jackson, "The photographs reveal a mark on the right side of Defendant's ***** at about the same relative location as the dark blemish located by Jordan Chandler on his drawing of Defendant's erect *****" and "Chandler's graphic representation of the discolored area on Defendant's ***** is substantially corroborated by the photographs."[51] Sneddon ended his declaration with "I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct except for those statements made on information and belief, as to those statements, I believe them to be true."[51][51] Sergeant Gary Spiegel, the sheriff’s photographer, claims he observed a dark spot on the lower side of Jackson’s *****.[52]
            how in the hell did he accurately describe those blotches if he didn't see them?

            Innocent doe!

            Comment


            • #46
              Look at Jackos left hand creepy mofo





              Comment


              • #47
                Look how creepy this pose is with one of the accusers, smh!

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by DARKSEID View Post
                  Next thing you know some 12 year old is gonna come out accurately describing how Mj's cum tasted and you'll still have people doubting he's a pedofile lol
                  Originally posted by Hype job View Post
                  Jackson paid $20 million to get them to drop the case after Jordan accurately described blotches on Michael Jackson's ***** and anus.



                  Leading investigators and the nations #1 expert on abuse and false claims found the claims credible.
                  More fake news. The boy said Jackson was circumcised

                  Initial media reports after the 1993 strip search (for example, Reuters, USA Today in January 1994), citing law enforcement sources, stated that the boy’s description did not match the photographs taken of Jackson’s genitalia. The claim that the photos matched the description spread through the media only later – particularly after an interview Sneddon gave to Vanity Fair’s Maureen Orth in September 1995 where he claimed the photographs matched Jordan’s description [2].

                  Interestingly, Dr. Richard Strick, the doctor who was present at the strip search from the authorities’ side, indicated in an interview with Fox News in October 2009 that he did not come to a conclusion on his own, but rather someone else told him later that it was a match.

                  “The genitalia were very oddly colored with dark skin and light skin and I was told later that the deposition and the photos that were taken absolutely matched what the child had described”
                  The boy's fake drawing of Mike's ***** shows it circumcises



                  Michael Jackson't autopsy report said he was not circumcised. So who is lying? The boy or Mike's *****?

                  The supposed "splotch" story is from the website thesmokinggun.com which deleted the story from their website after Jackson's autopsy showing the story was a lie. It can ony be found on the waybackmachine.com


                  http://web.archive.org/web/200906300...onsplotch.html

                  Learn the facts and stop with the fake news please

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View Post
                    More fake news. The boy said Jackson was circumcised



                    The boy's fake drawing of Mike's ***** shows it circumcises



                    Michael Jackson't autopsy report said he was not circumcised. So who is lying? The boy or Mike's *****?

                    The supposed "splotch" story is from the website thesmokinggun.com which deleted the story from their website after Jackson's autopsy showing the story was a lie. It can ony be found on the waybackmachine.com


                    http://web.archive.org/web/200906300...onsplotch.html

                    Learn the facts and stop with the fake news please
                    He got circumcision wrong ok but he accurately described blotches?

                    Detectives involved all admitted the descriptions matched, Jacko then settled.

                    What innocent man settles $20 million instead of proving his innocence?

                    Comment


                    • #50


                      It's all a conspiracy, the boy accusers (all boys), Conrad Murray's allusions, maid and manager witnesses, multiple accusers, accurate description of Jackos genitals resulting in millions paid out...

                      All a ploy to keep the black man down.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP