Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Alex Jones/Info Wars removed from Youtube, Facebook etc..

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View Post
    It's their company. Just like the NFL can stop players from kneeling, Facebook and these other companies can stop Alex Jones from being on their site.


    no, they are a social platform..... which is why they are answerable to congress

    ask Mark Zuckerburg where he holiday'd 2 weeks ago


    Originally posted by DoubleLeftH00k View Post
    Where they can all together shutdown a group or someone at the same time

    Scary when times when this is weaponized during election, this should be stopped

    Or cencervatives needs to come up with with a tech idea to counter this left leaning chinese controlled tech giants

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
      no, they are a social platform..... which is why they are answerable to congress

      ask Mark Zuckerburg where he holiday'd 2 weeks ago
      They answered to congress because of Russian hacking and accounts.

      Not because they were banning people. It shocks me you guys dont understand what a private company can do.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
        building 7
        the standing down of NORAD
        the Minnetta Testimony
        the fact that a plane did not hit the pentagon
        the fact that a plane did not go down in Shanksville
        the molten steel that burned for 7-9 WEEKS from thermite
        the payments they traced from Pakistan
        the involvement of MOSSAD
        the official lies
        the official coverups
        etc etc etc

        nobody who truly investigated 9/11 could not believe that bollocks

        people be dumb because they watch the news and assume that it must be true

        but NONE of that is the relevant point

        the point is.....

        * censorship is bad
        * the burning of the first amendment is bad
        * when they burn the second amendment, you guys are fcuked

        those amendments were put in place for a damn good reason..... by people who understand how this world works way more than most people do today......

        The one that gets me is the phone calls from mobile phones to family members. At the time some of them were made, the planes were supposedly at 30,000 feet. Mobile phones in 2001 couldn't work beyond 8000 feet if you were lucky. When it was pointed out to the investigators, they tried to say that the calls were made on air phones on the planes, but family members that received the calls already confirmed the caller ID was their relatives phone.

        So whatever happened there, those calls were definitely not made from inside the plane. It's impossible. All the relatives who got calls all say that the background was remarkably quiet with a good signal, as if it was just in a room somewhere.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by man down View Post
          They answered to congress because of Russian hacking and accounts.

          Not because they were banning people. It shocks me you guys dont understand what a private company can do.
          Yep

          Their site, their rules

          Comment


          • #95
            Facebook, Twitter and Apple, essential monopolies which control the flow of information to the mainstream web are carrying out coordinates information purges and liberal buffoons are like "Hells ya! I heard he was a racis!". Just the usual there. Waste your time interacting with them at your own peril.

            Alas it was inevitable. Free speech has always been an imaginary concept with too many loopholes to apply to reality. Alex Jones has no valuable friends. In opposing the colonization of Europe he is on the wrong side of a fertility boom. In opposing a war in Syria he is on the wrong side of the world's wealthiest egomaniacs.

            Regardless of what you think of his positions, his strategy was brilliant. He realized teenagers simply aren't receptive to lectures about work ethic and balanced government, etc. He lured them in with metaphorical zombie alien lingo and a pro-wrestler persona. From there they would be exposed to his far more intellectual subordinates.

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by man down View Post
              They answered to congress because of Russian hacking and accounts.

              Not because they were banning people. It shocks me you guys dont understand what a private company can do.
              Isn’t Facebook a publicly traded company like google?

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by man down View Post
                They answered to congress because of Russian hacking and accounts.

                Not because they were banning people. It shocks me you guys dont understand what a private company can do.
                It's not that simple (or it's not supposed to be). Publicly traded global corporations whose primary products are platforms for free communication are de facto public venues. Even Trump blocking people from posting to him (READ: Not blocking them from posting, just from posting to him) brought up big legal questions. The world's largest monopolies openly issuing a death sentence to pro-western media outlets and flaunting their ability to carry out coordinates purges is definitely also a big legal question.

                Eventually the InfoWars website will struggle to remain online as well. Most websites opposing the invasion & rape of Europe are simply deemed "supremacist" and kicked off of their provider.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by Zaroku View Post
                  Isn’t Facebook a publicly traded company like google?
                  Yep.

                  Ownership structure is largely irrelevant as they still have ability to control who posts stuff

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by //// View Post
                    It's not that simple (or it's not supposed to be). Publicly traded global corporations whose primary products are platforms for free communication are de facto public venues. Even Trump blocking people from posting to him (READ: Not blocking them from posting, just from posting to him) brought up big legal questions. The world's largest monopolies openly issuing a death sentence to pro-western media outlets and flaunting their ability to carry out coordinates purges is definitely also a big legal question.

                    Eventually the InfoWars website will struggle to remain online as well. Most websites opposing the invasion & rape of Europe are simply deemed "supremacist" and kicked off of their provider.
                    Facebook is an advertising platform

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Tomjas View Post
                      Yep.

                      Ownership structure is largely irrelevant as they still have ability to control who posts stuff
                      Yeah, I know. I got friends at both companies, and they can write and rewrite their policies as they wish.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP