NRA Head, They “Hate Individual Freedom”

[A-Wolf]

Well guess that shows how dumb the gun crowd is , if they'd be willing to kill people not to give up their guns. Again, what do they actually want the guns for? That's open to anyone to answer. I'd wager if u locked a few of them for.not handing them over, then a lot of people would follow suit. At the very least they should stop new guns being available for purchase. As with every crime you should try to minimise it, drugs are illegal, guns should be illegal. An item that's sole purpose is to kill people should not be freely available.and as much as you lot try to twist it into being a media agenda /liberal narrative to me and 99.999 percent of people over here in uk it just seems like common sense.

Bro, if you really want answers spend the next month listening to Alex Jones and watching conspiracy videos on Youtube..

[Hype job]

Think, moron.

Do you think the government would have any chance against hundreds of thousands or possibly millions of Cleetus' and Billy Bob's??

They'd destroy them in a day without deploying any ground troops.

[JimRaynor]

How do you "stop" them from having them?

Make a law?

Yes, exactly that. That's generally how governments enforce their will.

You clearly do not comprehend how American laws work. That's not creating a law, that's abolishing the 2nd amendment. And in order to do so you need astronomical approval not just from the Senate and the House, but from 39 states as well.

Libs and anti gun folk pitch stupid ideas that will never get passed. Why don't you start concentrating on more realistic propositions.

[Stebs]

Sales have fallen through the floor, Remington has gone bankrupt and all are struggling

Thanks for your input

Really Remington has had problems for a while now, nothing to do with the school shooting. This happens after every major shooting like this, everyone starts talking about gun control and stocks rise as gun sales go up....You can come up with a 100 articles with opposing stats but in the end the stats will show gun sales go up.

Thanks for your input

http://time.com/5161406/gunmaker-flo...ting-stock-up/

[Eff Pandas]

You clearly do not comprehend how American laws work. That's not creating a law, that's abolishing the 2nd amendment. And in order to do so you need astronomical approval not just from the Senate and the House, but from 39 states as well.

Libs and anti gun folk pitch stupid ideas that will never get passed. Why don't you start concentrating on more realistic propositions.

You don't need to end the 2nd amendment to make reasonable gun laws. You can't buy certain guns already. There is nothing in the 2nd amendment saying what guns are cool & what guns aren't cool.

[JimRaynor]

You don't need to end the 2nd amendment to make reasonable gun laws. You can't buy certain guns already. There is nothing in the 2nd amendment saying what guns are cool & what guns aren't cool.

You ban, the AR-15, that will eliminate .01% of gun murders, what exactly does that exactly accomplish aside from setting up the stage to ban hand guns?

[Razor Ramon]

They'd destroy them in a day without deploying any ground troops.

We've got a plan then. The government will bomb the 15 million rifle owners (or whatever it is, I'm not a Yank), who are also their own citizens, if they don't want to give their guns up. Even if it's only 1% of the total that puts up a fight over their guns, that's an awful lot of people Americas got to call the tanks in on to achieve what's being talked about here.

[A-Wolf]

They'd destroy them in a day without deploying any ground troops.

Details please.

[A-Wolf]

You clearly do not comprehend how American laws work. That's not creating a law, that's abolishing the 2nd amendment. And in order to do so you need astronomical approval not just from the Senate and the House, but from 39 states as well.

Libs and anti gun folk pitch stupid ideas that will never get passed. Why don't you start concentrating on more realistic propositions.

Hey preacher, he didn't specify, so ease up - and if you are following our conversation you'll notice we started isolating assault weapons WHICH ARE NOT ALL GUNS..

[Eff Pandas]

You ban, the AR-15, that will eliminate .01% of gun murders, what exactly does that exactly accomplish aside from setting up the stage to ban hand guns?

Its not about gun deaths per se. This isn't statistics. Thats something I don't think some of you guys get. Stopping production on these assault rifle type of guns is going to slow down these dummies who flip out from killing 30 kids in 10 minutes at schools like fish in a barrel.

The fish in a barrel angle to this problem is a large part of the problem & that can occur in any crowded place with these types of weapons. I've not heard of mass shooters so effective with minimal distance, maximum firepower/ability to injury & less need to be overall proficient with guns than these shooters using assault rifles. So if you want some stats here you go.


To me this is lawn darts type sh^t or those tiny crackerjack toys kids kept choking to death on & gots nothing to do with any old pieces of paper. Some mfers couldn't handle lawn darts & some parents weren't on top of things their kids stuck in their mouth so they had to quit selling those items. Assault rifles & other things that help more people to be killed easier by dummies is something that need not be sold anymore. Feel free to protect yourself, go hunting & just do w/e you buy a gun for minus killing mfers with the reasonable devices that we've deemed safer for public type firearms.

And if you got those types of guns now. Fair play. You obviously aren't a f#cking dipsh^t who's looking to go shoot up a school or a movie theater so keep doing whatever it is you're legally doing with them minus selling them to other people who might be f#cking dipsh^t.

Its reasonable sh^t if you think about it in the slightest & don't make it some usual R vs D bullsh^t dick measuring competition or some mark of man type activity or worse yet some sort of freedom thing when plenty of are "freedoms" are regulated to a more reasonable zone.