Racist Lady gets it all off her chest

[Monaco Slim]

She isn't racist, she's a realist. Everything she said was completely true.

[Chollo Vista]

She isn't racist, she's a realist. Everything she said was completely true.

Already debunked everything on the first page out the gate

Relax

[Chollo Vista]

The funny thing is that that alt has made the same type of pick that Elroy usually makes in the pick 'em game.

Lol I missed it

[Chollo Vista]

The black man is the violent one, right.

This innocent lady who peacefully lives in society can't be this vile and violent all the while knowing her power and history of her word vs a black man pertaining to law?

[JimRaynor]

exactly

Sure, some AA's can be violent, but do we really need to do a head count for how many millions of murders European and European nations are responsible for?

Just taking into consideration the following US wars:

American Revolution
War of 1812
Mexican War
Spanish-American War
World War I
World War II
Korean War
Vietnam War
Persian Gulf War (Desert Shield & Storm )
War on Terrorism
Iraq War

How many murders would you say Euro/Euro-Americans are responsible for there?

The blacks the violent ones, doe

This doesn't speak to white people, this speaks to people in general. People are evil, and deep down everyone has the capability to do horrendous things.

I don't have to mention Pol Pot, Mao, or the Japanese during world war II, all of whom slaughtered more people than all the wars you mentioned (excluding WWII of course) combined.

Blacks have a negative stigma in America on violence because they disproportionately account for majority of violent crime in this country. In other words, no one is afraid to walk through a white neighborhood at night, but the opposite could not be said of a black neighborhood.

[Chollo Vista]

This doesn't speak to white people

Yes it does... It speaks to Euro/Euro Americans

this speaks to people in general

US Wars do not speak to people in general. Do you know the history behind these wars? It all points to Euro/Euro Americans.

People are evil, and deep down everyone has the capability to do horrendous things.

This is true... Which is why I'm always confused when I hear how blacks are the only ones that are violent.

I don't have to mention Pol Pot, Mao, or the Japanese during world war II, all of whom slaughtered more people than all the wars you mentioned (excluding WWII of course) combined.

This is a lie... Close to 37 million civilians and military personnel died in World War 1 alone. Who started World War 1? I guarantee you it wasn't the blacks or asians.

The 37 million numbered trumps anything the guys you mentioned did. And that's just World War 1.

Blacks have a negative stigma in America on violence because they disproportionately account for majority of violent crime in this country

This is not true. You can skew facts/stats however you like.

For instance, Whites account for more violent crimes and homicides than Blacks... Your fall back stat is per capita for everything.

But when you really look at the stats, 5% of blacks account for around 37% of the US violent crime stats. Well, what about the other 95% of blacks that don't account for violent crimes?

In other words, no one is afraid to walk through a white neighborhood at night, but the opposite could not be said of a black neighborhood

This is a mighty generalization don't you think?

Again, why does what 5% of a people do, speak for the other 95% in your book?

[JimRaynor]

Yes it does... It speaks to Euro/Euro Americans
US Wars do not speak to people in general. Do you know the history behind these wars? It all points to Euro/Euro Americans.

Point is everyone has the capability to commit evil, so no it doesn't just speak to white euro/americans. If the Africans had the same means they'd do the same, don't be naive. Even now there are Genocides being committed in Sudan and Congo. Rwanda saw 1 million people slaughtered alone. This isn't to make an argument that one group of people is more evil than another, they're all evil.

This is true... Which is why I'm always confused when I hear how blacks are the only ones that are violent.

Black inhabited nations have more violence than non black inhabited nations, same is true for majority black populations in the States.

This is a lie... Close to 37 million civilians and military personnel died in World War 1 alone. Who started World War 1? I guarantee you it wasn't the blacks or asians.

The 37 million numbered trumps anything the guys you mentioned did. And that's just World War 1.

It's not a lie, 37 million casualties, 16 million deaths. Mao alone killed 45 million in 4 four years.
https://www.historyonthenet.com/how-...e-died-in-ww1/

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-en...s-2081630.html

This is not true. You can skew facts/stats however you like.

Of course it's true, you ignore facts to help make yourself feel better.

For instance, Whites account for more violent crimes and homicides than Blacks... Your fall back stat is per capita for everything.

But when you really look at the stats, 5% of blacks account for around 37% of the US violent crime stats. Well, what about the other 95% of blacks that don't account for violent crimes?

Incorrect, blacks account for about 52% of violent crime.
https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/htus8008.pdf

This is a mighty generalization don't you think?

Again, why does what 5% of a people do, speak for the other 95% in your book?

It's unfortunate 5% of people give the rest a really bad name. But to answer your question the best I can, I'd think it has to do with them dominating violent crime in every major US city, from Chicago, Baltimore, Camden, Oakland, St. Louis etc.

[Chollo Vista]

Point is everyone has the capability to commit evil, so no it doesn't just speak to white euro/americans.

Let me understand this. When you're defending the disproportionate violent history of Euro/Euro Americans, you say "everyone has the capability to commit evil", but when you talk about US violence, it's all about the blacks. Got it.

If the Africans had the same means they'd do the same, don't be naive

So again, to justify the violence of Euro/Euro Americans, you say "everyone" would do it including Africans, but when talking about the 5% of African Americans, it's all the African Americans fault that do the violence.

You're great at rationalizing white/Euro/Euro American violence and then single handedly pointing the finger at African Americans..... Only when talking about African American violence, do you want to talk per capita and not discuss the violence from Euro Americans and their account for the larger sum of death's in the last 400 years.

Even now there are Genocides being committed in Sudan and Congo. Rwanda saw 1 million people slaughtered alone. This isn't to make an argument that one group of people is more evil than another, they're all evil.

Yes and Euro/Euro Americans have committed that level of genocide times 60.

Black inhabited nations have more violence than non black inhabited nations, same is true for majority black populations in the States.

Oh really, please provide stats for black violent crimes in Switzerland, Denmark, Sweden, Austrailia, etc... I'll gladly wait.

It's not a lie, 37 million casualties, 16 million deaths. Mao alone killed 45 million in 4 four years.
https://www.historyonthenet.com/how-...e-died-in-ww1/

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-en...s-2081630.html

I don't know why you're trying to debate this when Europeans single handedly killed a nation of Native Americans, killed Mexicans, Asians, Middle Easterers over oil, Africans, etc etc.

That little 45 million stat drwarfs in comparison to Euro/Euro American reign in the last 4 centuries. Do you really want to compare stats?

They account for about 52% of violent crime.
https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/htus8008.pdf

Another false depiction. You showed stats from 1980-2008 that included a stretch during the 1980's that included the CIA creating war zones by dropping off crack cocaine in black neighborhoods, mass incarceration and the war on drugs.

Starting in 1980 did you see a heavy attack on black America and significant change in policy; thus creating said war zones.

https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s...ables/table-43

A study by the FBI conducted in 2015 shows:

Violent crimes:

Whites - 60%
Blacks - 36.4%

Murder:

White - 45%
Black - 51%

A big deal of those murders stemming from the non-sense in Chicago. Fair enough though. Again, 5% accounting for the majority of violent crimes.

It's unfortunate 5% of people give the rest a really bad name. But to answer your question the best I can, I'd think it has to do with them dominating violent crime in every major US city, from Chicago, Baltimore, Camden, Oakland, St. Louis etc

https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s...ables/table-43

Violent crime:

White - 60%
Black - 36.4%

[Monaco Slim]

If American justice were to ever be color blind, crime would have to be redefined and fairly enforced. For instance, white law breakers would not be treated any differently for their white-collar crimes than blue-collar criminals. The term white-collar crime was coined in 1940, and referred to illegal acts carried out by respectable members of the community or persons of high status in the course of their occupations. And, white collar crimes are usually nonviolent offenses carried out by respectable people to gain money, propery, or personal benefits through deceit. John Farley stated in his book, Sociology, that white-collar crimes cost the society from 200 billion a year not including the savings and loan thefts. This is 8 TIMES THE COST OF ALL COMMON, BLUE COLLAR CRIMES and have much more of an effect on society and the economy. Yet, of course, prisons are filled with more African American blue collar criminals.

With so many more expensive white-collar crimes being committed, why are there not more white-collar prisoners? Because most white-collar crimes are committed primarily by whites, and crime stats are skewed towards reporting blue-collar crimes. White collar crimes go to civil rather than criminal courts and are typically excluded from crime reports. When crimes such as inside stock trading, toxic waste dumping, embezzlement, bribery, income tax evasion, expense account padding, larceny, computer fraud, money laundering, extortion, blackmail, counterfeiting, government contract manipulations, and saving and loan thefts are included in the crime reports, the typical criminal turns out to be wealthy and white.


Criminals should be arrested and prosecuted, regardless of the color of the collar or color of the skin. Whites do not commit as many blue-collar crimes because their privileged status, contacts, options, and wealth gives them greater access to basic necessities and resources of the society, without their having to commit criminal acts.

If you turn on the TV, all you hear is about blue collar crimes mostly committed in the “ghetto’s”, but many media outlets, which happen to be all Euro-American owned, refuse to report these white collar crimes even though they have a greater effect on society (i.e. job loss, stock price drops, consumer price increases, court costs, jail time after conviction, never mind the actual cost of the crime itself; more ripple effects than blue collar crimes by far yet black America is constantly criminalized without looking at the grand scale.

Again, turn on the news and you’ll see headlines relating to murder, drugs, gunfights, etc, but you will almost never catch anything relating to white collar crimes. Of course not. Especially when a more recent study shows annual losses from white-collar crimes are estimated at 426 billion to 1.7 trillion dollars (https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publicatio...aspx?ID=167026).

Nobody cares about white collar crime.

People care about ******s murdering people and shooting little babies in the face.

[Chollo Vista]

Nobody cares about white collar crime.

People care about ******s murdering people and shooting little babies in the face.

So you care about welfare and free gov programs but don't care about white collar crimes that cost the nation 1.7 trillion dollars?

And lol @ you caring about black babies

Only time you all of a sudden care about blacks dying is when regurgitating your right wing talking points to justify the killing of innocent non combatants by police

Relax