Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Do you think the WM3 were guilty?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by Josh knight View Post
    I'm not 100% certain of anything but with all the evidence it seems likely they did it. I don't understand biased Callahan site. Most facts on that link are linked to different independent sources. Now I just want you to answer why all 3 had no alibis? What is the reason that none of them had no alibis? Do not just say it doesn't prove their guilt. I know that. I just want reason why during the exact time of the crime all three couldn't account for where they were or what they were doing?
    If they can't tell you, how would I be able to answer that?

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by -Antonio- View Post
      How can anyone read that Website and still believe they are innocent?
      Some people once their mind is made up. Are embarrassed to go back. No matter how much evidence is presented to them. I think it's an ego thing to.

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by maracho View Post
        the satanaist and his best friend do sound innocent when they speak but so did the dog killer Steven Avery in Making a Murderer
        They released his low IQ nephew though.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by maracho View Post
          I havnt reached a conclusion but the Satanist Echols was involved in all kinds of animal cruelty and had fantasies about sacrificing babies and drinking blood. Misskelley confessed five times. They both failed polygraph and lied about their alibis.

          Perplexing though is the fact that witnesses observed a fourth child enter the woods with the three victims and there's the anonymous DNA
          Already your bias is showing.

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by -Antonio- View Post
            How can anyone read that Website and still believe they are innocent?
            Go read some sites that point to them being innocent and see what you think.

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by siablo14 View Post
              Already your bias is showing.
              Ok please elaborate, if you dare

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by siablo14 View Post
                They released his low IQ nephew though.
                And your point being?

                Comment


                • #88
                  Definitely not guilty. Absolute disgrace of a prosecution.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by maracho View Post
                    Ok please elaborate, if you dare
                    You heard his association with Satan and instantly you want him to be guilty.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by maracho View Post
                      And your point being?
                      They don't think he was guilty. He also admitted to the crime but the crime scene he described was not possible.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP