Man I'm pro-gun but sometimes listening to stupid conservatives speak about the gun issue makes me cringe. "To blame assault weapons for these tragedies would be like blaming airplanes for the 9/11 attacks." Yea because any American can just go to the plane store and buy a 747. Most of these morons aren't capable of making reasonable and logical arguments. Conservative America needs smarter people representing us.
Are you saying Americans can't purchase private airplanes?
You literally can buy a 747 too... airlines frequently sell them used
Perhaps I'm missing your point
Most people being too dumb and/or poor to acquire an airplane doesn't mean they aren't readily available
What's your motto DON'T LET THE FACTS GET IN THE WAY OF A GOOD STORY ???
If you actually read my whole post, you must either have delusional memory or have a agenda...
If neither then Really, what a imagination !!!
You should write fiction or try your hand at Abstract Art ....
In my opening statement I said that I don't own any guns and don't plan on owning any guns...
You somehow interpreted that to be someone who plays around while looking at posters of M16s while fantasizing about being a Dirty Harry ??? I cringe at what you might conclude about those who actually do own guns ???
If I had your imagination, what could I conclude about you from your statement with equal vision ???
How about comparing you to Adolf Hitler (Gun control champion) or Joseph Stalin (Socialist champion)???
But enough with that..
The facts, you really want to go there?? OK...
THE BRITISH IMPOSED GUN CONTROL LAWS ON THE COLONIES !!!
Read this for starters...
Administrative and Regulatory Law News (AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION). Vol. 37 , no. 4 summer 1212.
In short..
The Brithish impose the 1774 import ban on firearms and gunpowder... The 1774-75 CONFISCATIONS of firearms and gunpowder, and the use of violence to effectuate the confiscations... These actions caused tension that turned into a shooting War... THIS IS ONE REASON THE 2ND AMENDMENT WAS PASSED TO BEGIN WITH...
The colonial revolutionaries DID NOT HAVE A ARMY... Each of the 13 colonies had their own militia made up of Citizens who were part-timers... Then each Colony raised regiments from its citizens for defense....
All Colonial soldiers started out as either part time citizen militia or citizen, using there own guns and guns confiscated from the British during battles....
Of course if they were trained after entry..
My point was dead on, but thanks to your need for nuance we've expanded the point...
NOW OUR READERS CAN RESEARCH THE BRITISH IMPOSED GUN CONTROL LAWS AND VIOLENT CONFISCATIONS IN 1774 & 1775 ...
You sir, are a credit to your cause... Well Done ...
Your syntax is nearly as atrocious as your overuse of the ellipses.
I'm certain there are some more absolutely awful points for me to deconstruct somewhere within this mess, but the structure of your argument is so horrid that I quite literally cannot be bothered.
Your syntax is nearly as atrocious as your overuse of the ellipses.
I'm certain there are some more absolutely awful points for me to deconstruct somewhere within this mess, but the structure of your argument is so horrid that I quite literally cannot be bothered.
So you went from lowbrow insults to highbrow insults, all of which are completely inconsequential to the issues.... A Weak attempt to change the subject, I suppose... (Clearly I haven't read Carnegie)
I'll make it easy for you... (Baby steps, ok Bob?)
IN THE BEGINNING...
FACT
THE BRITISH IMPOSED GUN CONTROL LAWS WITH VIOLENT CONFISCATIONS OF FIREARMS AND GUNPOWDER IN 1774-75 ON THE COLONIES.... THIS LEADS TO A SHOOTING WAR...
Look it up...
FACT
THE COLONIES HAD NO ARMY, ONLY PART TIME CITIZEN MILITIA WHO OWNED THEIR OWN GUNS...
FACT
THE COLONIES RAISED REGIMENTS FROM ITS CITIZENS FOR DEFENSE... THESE CITIZENS HAD THEIR OWN GUNS....THEN THEY WERE TRAINED...
FACT
I DON'T HAVE A GUN AND DIDN'T WANT ONE, BUT YOUR DIZZYING INTELLECT MIGHT HAVE INSPIRED ME TO RECONSIDER....
So you went from lowbrow insults to highbrow insults, all of which are completely inconsequential to the issues.... A Weak attempt to change the subject, I suppose... (Clearly I haven't read Carnegie)
I'll make it easy for you... (Baby steps, ok Bob?)
IN THE BEGINNING...
FACT
THE BRITISH IMPOSED GUN CONTROL LAWS WITH VIOLENT CONFISCATIONS OF FIREARMS AND GUNPOWDER IN 1774-75 ON THE COLONIES.... THIS LEADS TO A SHOOTING WAR...
Look it up...
FACT
THE COLONIES HAD NO ARMY, ONLY PART TIME CITIZEN MILITIA WHO OWNED THEIR OWN GUNS...
FACT
THE COLONIES RAISED REGIMENTS FROM ITS CITIZENS FOR DEFENSE... THESE CITIZENS HAD THEIR OWN GUNS....THEN THEY WERE TRAINED...
FACT
I DON'T HAVE A GUN AND DIDN'T WANT ONE, BUT YOUR DIZZYING INTELLECT MIGHT HAVE INSPIRED ME TO RECONSIDER....
You seem to be really hell bent on having a debate with somebody who really doesn't give a **** about anything you say.
My sarcasm isn't an attempt to change the subject, it's me being bored to tears with your ******ation.
You seem to be really hell bent on having a debate with somebody who really doesn't give a **** about anything you say.
My sarcasm isn't an attempt to change the subject, it's me being bored to tears with your ******ation.
FACT. (Ellipses)
Are you really that dunce ???
Here's a revelation, I'M USING YOU !!! Thanks for the layups, you're making it so easy...
The reason why I'm responding to your insults and imaginary facts is shed light to the subject of the THREAD...
People are actually reading these posts and hopefully are searching the historical facts...
You are actually helping me expose the truth to others... Thanks a bunch, keep up the good work !!!
Do you think the people might be interested in Adolf Hitler and how he manipulated the German government into banning guns in Germany before the Nazis gained control ??? It's a fascinating subject who's fingerprints are seen everywhere today...
Shall we begin ???
Or should we continue with the Constitution and the Bill of Rights ???
If you don't care, then walk away... The insults are so adolescent...
Just when I think you couldn't possibly mangle the English language any further you go and one-up yourself in the very first sentence of your rebuttal.
Dunce is an insult. It's a synonym for a stupid person. Also known as a total fuckwit. Like you.
You literally just asked me "Are you really that stupid person?"
And yet I bet you sat there with a smug smile of satisfaction on your face when you hit the submit reply button on that one, thinking that you had finally got me for sure this time around.
Comment