SUPER RARE high quality footage of the WTC jumpers on 9/11 WOW!!!!!

[spytactics]

I'm not starting anything.

I can't understand how a building collapsed like that through jet fuel, period.

If somebody told you something that your logic and knowledge told you didn't add up, what are you supposed to do? Say nothing and keep your head down?

Green sent

[Rudyo]

I'm not starting anything.

I can't understand how a building collapsed like that through jet fuel, period.

If somebody told you something that your logic and knowledge told you didn't add up, what are you supposed to do? Say nothing and keep your head down?

I don't think there was a conspiracy, but don't really care much anyways. It happened. The whole "jet fuel" argument is antiquated and kind of outdated but it's all good yo.

[The Noose]

I'm not starting anything.

I can't understand how a building collapsed like that through jet fuel, period.

If somebody told you something that your logic and knowledge told you didn't add up, what are you supposed to do? Say nothing and keep your head down?

No, you should look into it.
But the science behind such a chaotic event isnt so easily explained or understood.

I dont think any one of us is qualified to suggest things didnt add up when it comes to the towers collapse.

[BigNuts]

It's clear, but it doesn't really show much in a sense of the horrific jumps.

I disagree. When the ground crumbles underneath that man, you can see him hanging on the very edge of the building from a very high altitude. You then see a couple more people jump from the same exact area. The heat/fire must have been intense for them to jump out like that.

[HanzGruber]

I still don't understand how jet fuel caused the building to collapse the way it did. There's no way.

jet fuel cant smelt steel beams

[BigNuts]

But the science behind such a chaotic event isnt so easily explained or understood.

I agree with this. On paper aka "in theory" it shouldn't have collapsed.

But at the same time, look at space shuttle columbia. It wasn't supposed to blow up, but it did.

[iLovesoccermoms]

I still don't understand how jet fuel caused the building to collapse the way it did. There's no way.

that's exactly what I was thinking the entire damn time

[The Noose]

I agree with this. On paper aka "in theory" it shouldn't have collapsed.

But at the same time, look at space shuttle columbia. It wasn't supposed to blow up, but it did.

My favourite example is the Titanic. Unsinkable ship in theory.

[Weltschmerz]

No, you should look into it.
But the science behind such a chaotic event isnt so easily explained or understood.

I dont think any one of us is qualified to suggest things didnt add up when it comes to the towers collapse.

Many qualified people have suggested the official story doesn't add up, though. But most people don't want to hear it.

[Nubia]

Well I think a plane crashing into it at 500 miles an hour weakened the building first.

Then a fire, doesn't have to melt the metal but heating it weakens it, couple that with an uneven load distribution due to the damage of the crash and down goes the building

Aren't the housings typically metal (i.e. the joints) but the rest is made with concrete?

How can a plane hitting the top of the building cause concrete to collapse like that?