I explained how it was a simple case of Cause and Effect using irrefutable facts.
You're very close to going on Ignore for attrition tactics by doing the broken record routine.
But for now I'll play along.
Venezuela didn't have shortages under a free market system but had massive shortages after moving to a socialist system. You claim them moving to socialism wasn't the cause of the shortages.
What do you say was the cause of their shortages after they moved to a socialist system if it wasn't their moving to said socialist system that was the cause?
I already mentioned the fall in oil prices, and mismanagement/corruption, which can happen under ANY economic system.
There isn't a a simple cause and effect because there are clearly confounding factors you've conveniently chosen to ignore to further your agenda.
There are plenty of capitalist ****holes. Is their poverty due purely to capitalism?
There will always be some poverty in a capitalist system.
We admit that.
However, there is much more poverty in socialist countries, where EVERYONE not in the political class or the military is in poverty, waiting in bread lines, etc.
Socialism
ˈsəʊʃəlɪz(ə)m/Submit
noun
a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
Government mismanagement and corruption never happens under other economic systems?
There will always be some poverty in a capitalist system.
We admit that.
However, there is much more poverty in socialist countries
Some, not all. It's better to live in Cuba (socialist) than Bangladesh (capitalist), it's better to live in Sweden (democratic socialist) than Pakistan (capitalist).
Socialism
ˈsəʊʃəlɪz(ə)m/Submit
noun
a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
Some, not all. It's better to live in Cuba (socialist) than Bangladesh (capitalist), it's better to live in Sweden (democratic socialist) than Pakistan (capitalist).
Non sequitur
We're discussing the fact that socialism ALWAYS results in shortages.
Comment