not the biggest trump fan but he trolls the sjw types better than anyone, can imagine them crying tears of anger everytime he tweets
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
OFFICIAL: Donald Trump thread.
Collapse
-
-
More of the same bull**** from the left, now they are saying prove yourself innocent. How about some due process, how about following the rule of law. Funny, repubs were not allowed to participate in schiffs closed hearing, than repubs were not allowed to call witness. U get what u give motherfu ckers. Stop the crying
Comment
-
Originally posted by MELLY-MEL... View PostMore of the same bull**** from the left, now they are saying prove yourself innocent. How about some due process, how about following the rule of law. Funny, repubs were not allowed to participate in schiffs closed hearing, than repubs were not allowed to call witness. U get what u give motherfu ckers. Stop the crying
There were 47 Republicans in Schiff’s hearings plus lawyersLast edited by Tomjas; 01-19-2020, 04:11 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Furn View Postregardless of duty or whatever they can see this new evidence if they so choose and then that will show everyone that Trump is totally innocent rather than look like he's hiding something.
If I was wrongly accused of something id want all the evidence out in the open.
Comment
-
Candace Owens 2020 Blexit LIVE!!!
Watch Live: Candace Owens’ First 2020 Blexit Rally Kicks Off in NC
Watch live as Candace Owens kicks off her first Blexit – or Black exit – rally of 2020 in Charlotte, North Carolina, on Sunday.
The event is scheduled to begin at 4:00 p.m. EST on Sunday, January 19. A video will appear above once the rally begins.
Owens announced Blexit in October 2018 as “the black exit from the Democrat Party,” vowing to take her mission of exodus to cities controlled by Democratic politicians.
Since then, Blexit rallies have been held across the country and will continue to take place throughout 2020. The video has been provided courtesy of Blexit.
You can follow Alana Mastrangelo on Twitter at Armastrangelo, and on Instagram.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Vlad_ View PostOh it would be hilarious if the Senate calls Biden and his cokehead son to testify, with Bernie and Warren being there doing Jury duty for months. It would be awesome having those ******ed democrats spending 90% of their campaign trail on Jury duty discussing creepy Joe.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Furn View PostIs that the evidence that's being blocked ?
The forthcoming bombshell investigative book Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite contains 1,126 endnotes totaling 83 pages of source material, Breitbart News has learned.
In addition, the book contains no unnamed sources. Instead, it is based on hard evidence and documents, including: foreign and domestic corporate and legal records, tax liens, lobbyist disclosures, property records, White House visitor logs, federal bankruptcies, and federal criminal trial records.
Publishing giant HarperCollins has kept Profiles in Corruption under a strict embargo. The book will reportedly expose how five members of Joe Biden’s family—the “Biden Five”—scored “tens of millions of dollars” in taxpayer money and guaranteed loans. In addition, the book is said to contain never-before-reported bombshell revelations about Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, Amy Klobuchar, Cory Booker, Sherrod Brown, and Eric Garcetti.
Last week Amazon named the book its “most anticipated” nonfiction book based on pre-sale volume. Ten days before the book’s January 21 release, it had already hit #1 on Amazon across all book genres.
The book’s writer, Government Accountability Institute President and Breitbart News senior contributor Peter Schweizer, is a five-time New York Times bestseller author who penned Clinton Cash and Secret Empires. According to Axios, Schweizer and his GAI team of investigators spent a year and a half researching Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite.
Sean Hannity will kick off the book’s official launch on Monday.
https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2020/01/19/profiles-in-corruption-contains-1126-endnotes-no-unnamed-sources/
Comment
-
Originally posted by mathed View Post‘Profiles in Corruption’ Contains 1,126 Endnotes, No Unnamed Sources'
The forthcoming bombshell investigative book Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite contains 1,126 endnotes totaling 83 pages of source material, Breitbart News has learned.
In addition, the book contains no unnamed sources. Instead, it is based on hard evidence and documents, including: foreign and domestic corporate and legal records, tax liens, lobbyist disclosures, property records, White House visitor logs, federal bankruptcies, and federal criminal trial records.
Publishing giant HarperCollins has kept Profiles in Corruption under a strict embargo. The book will reportedly expose how five members of Joe Biden’s family—the “Biden Five”—scored “tens of millions of dollars” in taxpayer money and guaranteed loans. In addition, the book is said to contain never-before-reported bombshell revelations about Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, Amy Klobuchar, Cory Booker, Sherrod Brown, and Eric Garcetti.
Last week Amazon named the book its “most anticipated” nonfiction book based on pre-sale volume. Ten days before the book’s January 21 release, it had already hit #1 on Amazon across all book genres.
The book’s writer, Government Accountability Institute President and Breitbart News senior contributor Peter Schweizer, is a five-time New York Times bestseller author who penned Clinton Cash and Secret Empires. According to Axios, Schweizer and his GAI team of investigators spent a year and a half researching Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite.
Sean Hannity will kick off the book’s official launch on Monday.
https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2020/01/19/profiles-in-corruption-contains-1126-endnotes-no-unnamed-sources/
My question is why, when every one of the 15 other Senate impeachment trials has had evidence and witness testimony presented, is this different ?
Especially when trumps side has the majority and they are sure he's done nothing wrong ?
It just looks really bad from outsider pov if there's no evidence presented and he's let off by his own side.
Comment
Comment