Originally posted by BALLS DEEP
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
OFFICIAL: Donald Trump thread.
Collapse
-
-
Thoughts on this from the foreigners here
Center
— Nial Rortsfike Elkim (@NialElkim) June 15, 2019
• Bernie Sanders
• Mike Gravel
• Tulsi Gabbard
Center Right
• Elizabeth Warren
Right
• Cory Booker
• Kirsten Gillibrand
• Kamala Harris
• Jay Inslee
Extreme Right
• Michael Bennet
• Joe Biden
• Pete Buttigieg
• John Hickenlooper
• Amy Klobuchar
• Beto
Comment
-
Dime store dictator at it again. He hates the Constitution and freedom. Especially freedom of speech which we saw with the Kaepernick situation. You'd hope a President, while not agreeing with the protest, would err on the side of the 1st amendment. He also wants to use the power of the government to force private companies to give people a platform on their site.
Even Scalia disagrees with prohibiting burning the flag. pic.twitter.com/VcOn4Zn4ki
— Jeffrey Guterman (@JeffreyGuterman) June 15, 2019
Comment
-
Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View PostDime store dictator at it again. He hates the Constitution and freedom.
The question is open to any superfan on the forum. And I'm asking for a straight answer, citing the Constitution. No convoluted, word-twisting answers.
Just cite where in the Constitution we had a specific right, and then show that Trump took away that right(s) from us.
Let's see what you guys come up with.....
Comment
-
Pentagon Keeps Trump in the Dark About its Cyber Attacks on Russia
“Intelligence officials described broad hesitation to go into detail with [the president] about operations,” the report said
Peter Wade June 15, 2019 6:31PM ET
On Saturday, the New York Times published an important story about how the United States military branches are attempting to thwart and combat Russian cyber attacks on American utility networks and interference in elections. But deeper into the article, an interesting and disturbing nugget has drawn attention: The Pentagon has gone out of its way to keep President Donald Trump ignorant of certain details about the operation because of “the possibility that he might countermand it or discuss it with foreign officials.”
After giving an in-depth account about the “deployment of American computer code” into Russia’s electric power grid, to work as both a warning to Russian President Vladimir Putin and a more offensive posture in the cyber warfare realm, The Times then wrote:
“Two administration officials said they believed Mr. Trump had not been briefed in any detail about the steps to place ‘implants’ — software code that can be used for surveillance or attack — inside the Russian grid.
“Pentagon and intelligence officials described broad hesitation to go into detail with Mr. Trump about operations against Russia for concern over his reaction — and the possibility that he might countermand it or discuss it with foreign officials, as he did in 2017 when he mentioned a sensitive operation in Syria to the Russian foreign minister.”
New laws, enacted by Congress last year, allow such “clandestine military activity” in cyberspace to go ahead without the president’s approval. So, in this case, those new laws are protecting American interests… by keeping the sitting president out of the loop. What a (scary) time to be alive.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politic...russia-848695/
Comment
-
Originally posted by BALLS DEEP View PostPentagon Keeps Trump in the Dark About its Cyber Attacks on Russia
“Intelligence officials described broad hesitation to go into detail with [the president] about operations,” the report said
Peter Wade June 15, 2019 6:31PM ET
On Saturday, the New York Times published an important story about how the United States military branches are attempting to thwart and combat Russian cyber attacks on American utility networks and interference in elections. But deeper into the article, an interesting and disturbing nugget has drawn attention: The Pentagon has gone out of its way to keep President Donald Trump ignorant of certain details about the operation because of “the possibility that he might countermand it or discuss it with foreign officials.”
After giving an in-depth account about the “deployment of American computer code” into Russia’s electric power grid, to work as both a warning to Russian President Vladimir Putin and a more offensive posture in the cyber warfare realm, The Times then wrote:
“Two administration officials said they believed Mr. Trump had not been briefed in any detail about the steps to place ‘implants’ — software code that can be used for surveillance or attack — inside the Russian grid.
“Pentagon and intelligence officials described broad hesitation to go into detail with Mr. Trump about operations against Russia for concern over his reaction — and the possibility that he might countermand it or discuss it with foreign officials, as he did in 2017 when he mentioned a sensitive operation in Syria to the Russian foreign minister.”
New laws, enacted by Congress last year, allow such “clandestine military activity” in cyberspace to go ahead without the president’s approval. So, in this case, those new laws are protecting American interests… by keeping the sitting president out of the loop. What a (scary) time to be alive.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politic...russia-848695/
Comment
-
Two administration officials told The Times that they did not think President Tump was informed in detail about the move to put implants, code that can be used to surveil or attack, in the Russian grid.
"did not think Trump was informed in DETAIL"
Yeah this is all typical left wing sources say BS. We all saw how that went over for the last two and a half years.
Lol and it was Bolton that did this? You're trying to tell me he didnt tell Trump bahahaha.
Comment
-
Originally posted by man down View PostSo whats their names?
"did not think Trump was informed in DETAIL"
Yeah this is all typical left wing sources say BS. We all saw how that went over for the last two and a half years.
Lol and it was Bolton that did this? You're trying to tell me he didnt tell Trump bahahaha.
1sad had a meltdown about it
Comment
-
Comment