OFFICIAL: Donald Trump thread.

[Motorcity Cobra]

No, that was not the model.

Libya didn't have nuclear weapons.

This is about NK getting rid of it's nuclear weapons.

No one called for them to get rid of "defensive weapons".

Apples and oranges.

and fyi, you don't need nukes to rule over an unarmed populace. North Korea had their people under heel (and disarmed) long before they acquired nuclear weapons.

You need to do more independent research, as opposed to mindlessly repeating political talking points.

Remember dude, they admitted to lying to y'all and calling you "stupid" for believing their lies.

I at least respect you enough to be honest with you.

They don't, yet you cheerlead for them and attack and argue with me. I truly don't understand your way of thinking.

N. Korea saw it the same way I did. But let's listen to 1bad65. He knows it all.

Seriously, how arrogant do you have to be to tell N. Korea they're wrong?

[Motorcity Cobra]

So no advanced warning to Japan or S. Korea

Pompeo declines to say whether the US gave South Korea and Japan advance warning that POTUS was backing out of the summit.

— Nicholas Wadhams (@nwadhams) May 24, 2018

[1bad65]

N. Korea saw it the same way I did. But let's listen to 1bad65. He knows it all.

I just know the facts. And I'm trying to teach them to you.

What did I say in my post that you assert is not fact?

Seriously, how arrogant do you have to be to tell N. Korea they're wrong?

They are wrong on many things.

You do realize they are starving to death by the millions, their economy is shot, and their soldiers are full of parasites, don't you?

When you're doing things right, that kind of stuff doesn't happen.

[1bad65]

So no advanced warning to Japan or S. Korea

Pompeo declines to say whether the US gave South Korea and Japan advance warning that POTUS was backing out of the summit.

— Nicholas Wadhams (@nwadhams) May 24, 2018

Fool.

He declined to answer.

He didn't say they weren't notified in advance.

You can't even keep up with your own posts!!

[Motorcity Cobra]

Fool.

He declined to answer.

He didn't say they weren't notified in advance.

You can't even keep up with your own posts!!

He declined to answer because the only right answer is yes. Warning Japan and S. Korea is the right thing to do so nobody would be surprised if they did. By choosing not to answer that let's you know they didn't do it. Why would he decline to answer about doing the right thing? Now watch in a couple hours we'll get reports from Japan and S. Korea saying they weren't told ahead of time. That's how Trump operates.

I guarantee I'm right about this.

[1bad65]

He declined to answer because the only right answer is yes.

Proof of that claim, please.

I guarantee I'm right about this.

Then citing a source or two proving it should be a breeze.

[Motorcity Cobra]

I just know the facts. And I'm trying to teach them to you.

What did I say in my post that you assert is not fact?



They are wrong on many things.

You do realize they are starving to death by the millions, their economy is shot, and their soldiers are full of parasites, don't you?

When you're doing things right, that kind of stuff doesn't happen.

I'm pretty sure you aren't aware of the letter from last week that I'm talking about. If you were there is no way you'd still talk this nonsense you're talking. So imma post the letter and let's see who's correct.

Pyongyang, May 16 (KCNA) — Kim Kye Gwan, first vice-minister of Foreign Affairs of the DPRK, made public the following press statement on Wednesday:

Kim Jong Un, chairman of the State Affairs Commission of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, made a strategic decision to put an end to the unpleasant history of the DPRK-U.S. relations and met Pompeo, U.S. secretary of state, for two times during his visit to our country and took very important and broad-minded steps for peace and stability in the Korean peninsula and the world.

In response to the noble intention of Chairman Kim Jong Un, President Trump stated his position for terminating the historically deep-rooted hostility and improving the relations between the DPRK and the U.S.

I appreciated the position positively with an expectation that upcoming DPRK-U.S. summit would be a big step forward for catalyzing détente on the Korean peninsula and building a great future.

But now prior to the DPRK-U.S. summit, unbridled remarks provoking the other side of dialogue are recklessly made in the U.S. and I am totally disappointed as these constitute extremely unjust behavior.

High-ranking officials of the White House and the Department of State including Bolton, White House national security adviser, are letting loose the assertions of so-called Libya mode of nuclear abandonment, “complete, verifiable and irreversible denuclearization”, “total decommissioning of nuclear weapons, missiles, biochemical weapons”. etc, while talking about formula of “abandoning nuclear weapons first, compensating afterwards”.

This is not an expression of intention to address the issue through dialogue. It is essentially a manifestation of awfully sinister move to impose on our dignified state the destiny of Libya or Iraq which had been collapsed due to yielding the whole of their countries to big powers.

I cannot suppress indignation at such moves of the U.S., and harbor doubt about the U.S. sincerity for improved DPRK-U.S. relations through sound dialogue and negotiations.

World knows too well that our country is neither Libya nor Iraq which have met miserable fate.

It is absolutely absurd to dare compare the DPRK, a nuclear weapon state, to Libya which had been at the initial stage of nuclear development.

We shed light on the quality of Bolton already in the past, and we do not hide our feeling of repugnance towards him.

If the Trump administration fails to recall the lessons learned from the past when the DPRK-U.S. talks had to undergo twists and setbacks owing to the likes of Bolton and turns its ear to the advice of quasi-“patriots” who insist on Libya mode and the like, prospects of upcoming DPRK-U.S. summit and overall DPRK-U.S. relations will be crystal clear.

We have already stated our intention for denuclearization of the Korean peninsula and made clear on several occasions that precondition for denuclearization is to put an end to anti-DPRK hostile policy and nuclear threats and blackmail of the United States.

But now, the U.S. is miscalculating the magnanimity and broad-minded initiatives of the DPRK as signs of weakness and trying to embellish and advertise as if these are the product of its sanctions and pressure.

The U.S. is trumpeting as if it would offer economic compensation and benefit in case we abandon nuke. But we have never had any expectation of U.S. support in carrying out our economic construction and will not at all make such a deal in future, either.

It is a ridiculous comedy to see that the Trump administration, claiming to take a different road from the previous administrations, still clings to the outdated policy on the DPRK – a policy pursued by previous administrations at the time when the DPRK was at the stage of nuclear development.

If President Trump follows in the footsteps of his predecessors, he will be recorded as more tragic and unsuccessful president than his predecessors, far from his initial ambition to make unprecedented success.

If the Trump administration takes an approach to the DPRK-U.S. summit with sincerity for improved DPRK-U.S. relations, it will receive a deserved response from us. However, if the U.S. is trying to drive us into a corner to force our unilateral nuclear abandonment, we will no longer be interested in such dialogue and cannot but reconsider our proceeding to the DPRK-U.S. summit.

[Motorcity Cobra]

Proof of that claim, please.



Then citing a source or two proving it should be a breeze.

That claim is my reading of his answer. If they gave them a heads up then he'd say yes. By not saying yes and declining to answer that tells me they didn't give them a heads up. The proof will be in a couple hours when Japan and S. Korea state they weren't given a heads up. I guarantee I'm right about this. Just wait.

[1bad65]

That claim is my reading of his answer.

So you have no proof, just your typical team loyalty.

Got it.

[1bad65]

I'm pretty sure you aren't aware of the letter from last week that I'm talking about. If you were there is no way you'd still talk this nonsense you're talking. So imma post the letter and let's see who's correct.

Again, those countries did not have nukes.

NK does, and we're asking them to get rid of those.

No one is saying they have to completely disarm.

They'll be left with plenty of weapons to keep their unarmed populace under heel.

Can you please, please try and keep up here.