Originally posted by BostonGuy
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
OFFICIAL: Donald Trump thread.
Collapse
-
Originally posted by lex_fugitive View PostUnless of course, a candidate for president paid a **** star to keep her quiet right before an election. Because if it was done for that purpose, it is illegal. And that is what Trumps attorney Guilani has stated the payment was for.
You'll be shown to be wrong in due time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 1bad65 View PostI didn't vote for Trump because of his moral compass.
I voted for him because I wanted a tax cut, regulations cut, a Constitutionalist put on the Supreme Court, and my gun rights guaranteed, among other things. These are things that matter.
I've not yet met a Trump voter who voted for him for being a great husband.
Who Trump banged, a decade ago to boot, is just nonsense for superfans to trash talk about.
It took Obama to get us out of that. He slashed unemployment from 10 percent all the way down to 4.7 percent.
And no one is calling for taking away guns. Many have the same stance that Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush did, that automatic assault rifles should be banned. It was called the Brady Bill, and was intact for a decade. It was championed by Ronald Reagan. It was called the Brady Bill because the guy with Reagan who got show in the assignation attempt, and spent the rest of his life in a wheelchair, was named Brady. Also, the tax cuts for middle class and working class families are only for two years. The ones for corporations are permanent.
Comment
-
Originally posted by lex_fugitive View PostClinton was able to hold onto the agreement until he left office in 2001. Despite Republican efforts, for four years the North Koreans submitted to inspectors -- at least in some locations -- and the United States provided fuel.
But after Bush took office, the deal began to crumble. The Bush administration argued that intelligence reports revealed the North Koreans were continuing to enrich plutonium at another site that monitors didn’t have access to.
http://www.ibtimes.com/failed-north-...eement-2008598
You see, North Korea continually blocked international inspectors from visiting sites. Iran did not do that one time during the three years of this agreement. So, because North Korea, BLOCKED international inspectors from visiting sites, we should allow Iran to develop nukes???? Sorry, big difference.
And most importantly, what is the current plan to stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons?
Doesn't sound like a good deal to me
Comment
-
Originally posted by lex_fugitive View PostClinton was able to hold onto the agreement until he left office in 2001. Despite Republican efforts....
Oh Lord....
Originally posted by lex_fugitive View PostAnd most importantly, what is the current plan to stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons?[/I][/B]
People with common sense are running things now. Don't worry, it'll be fine.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by 1bad65 View PostActually it's not, but if you want to think that go right ahead.
You'll be shown to be wrong in due time.
It is not illegal to pay a **** star to keep quiet before the election, if you mark that down as a campaign expense. If you don't that is a clear violation of the law. As Rudy Guiliani explained, it wasn't a campaign contribution because Trump paid Cohen back. However, you still need to report that.
Trump's own lawyer just said that, you idiot.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by 1bad65 View PostThat's all the Republicans fault doe.
LMFAO!!!
Jimmy Carter has made repeated trips to North Korea over the past 20 plus years. Everytime, former President Carter has said, all North Korea wants is an actual peace treaty officially ending the war in exchange to abandon all nuclear deals.
And if Iran was blocking inspectors from sites, then they would be doing the same thing. The thing is, there are record numbers of international inspectors in Iran and not one has complained about not being allowed in anywhere.
So, please tell me, what is the plan to stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons?
Comment
-
Originally posted by lex_fugitive View PostYou do realize what happened last time we slashed taxes for the super-rich, and slashed regulations? It is called The Great Recession.
That's a long-ago refuted talking point.
This isn't good. First you were completely unaware of the Clinton Korean nuclear deal, and you're repeating refuted DNC talking points.
The housing market implosion led to the Great Recession. That's not even up for debate. And I've never heard anyone blame tax cuts for tanking the housing market, but if you want to try I'm here to be entertained....
Originally posted by lex_fugitive View PostIt took Obama to get us out of that. He slashed unemployment from 10 percent all the way down to 4.7 percent.
While it eventually went down to under 5%, it was years after Obama said it would fall that low.
I'm assuming you aren't familiar with the Romer-Bernstein chard, so here it is:
Even a blind squirrel eventually finds a nut.
Originally posted by lex_fugitive View PostAnd no one is calling for taking away guns.
But you've got homework to do on so much already, I'll stop here.
Comment
Comment