How many nations gave evidence of Trump-Russia contacts to U.S. intelligence BEFORE the FBI ever saw the Steele Dossier?
— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) January 1, 2018
🇬🇧 United Kingdom
🇩🇪 Germany
🇪🇪 Estonia
🇳🇱 Netherlands
🇵🇱 Poland
🇦🇺 Australia
🇫🇷 France
We knew this in APRIL. https://t.co/s3xPhBpMUu
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
OFFICIAL: Donald Trump thread.
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View PostAustralian media confirms NYT report that George Papadopoulos told an Australian diplomat in May 2016 that the Russians had dirt on Hillary Clinton; that conversation was passed on to officials in the Australian government. https://t.co/E7hQena7gF
— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) January 1, 2018
How come you aren’t worried about the dirt on Hillary?
You know, that Hillary and dnc and media colluded to influence elections by rigging primaries and debates.
But of course you are a pro-criminal BLM idiot, so you support criminal activity.
Just another example of it here.
Russia/trump was a whistleblower and should be protected by whistleblower laws.
Comment
-
Sounds like a very Hillary thing to do
Trump to send thousands more troops to Afghanistan in 2018 in break with campaign rhetoric https://t.co/IAFKCLO7ih pic.twitter.com/GhDmKB8uGI
— The Hill (@thehill) January 1, 2018
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali View PostHow come you aren’t worried about the dirt on Hillary?
You know, that Hillary and dnc and media colluded to influence elections by rigging primaries and debates.
But of course you are a pro-criminal BLM idiot, so you support criminal activity.
Just another example of it here.
Russia/trump was a whistleblower and should be protected by whistleblower laws.
Sessions has so far resisted these calls for a special counsel, telling Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) during a House Judiciary Committee hearing in mid-November that it would take “a factual basis that meets the standard of a special counsel” for an appointment to happen.”Last edited by Motorcity Cobra; 01-01-2018, 06:45 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali View PostHow come you aren’t worried about the dirt on Hillary?
You know, that Hillary and dnc and media colluded to influence elections by rigging primaries and debates.
Hillary can break the laws in handling classified information. It's no big deal. Comey can admit to leaking. Obama can ship pallets of dollars to Iran. It's cool.
But we have to go full bore investigating Donald Trump on Russian collusion despite the fact we've been at it nearly a year and still have zero evidence of collusion with Russia.
Superfan logic.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View PostIf Hillary did something wrong she should also be investigated also. The Republicans control the House and Senate. They have subpoena. Sessions, a Republican and Trump appointee, is head of the DOJ. If there is actionable evidence against Hillary then they should take action. Why aren't they taking action?
Hillary is obviously part of the corrupt establishment, along with dnc and media..
Media isn’t going to cover or investigate
Dnc is going to protect her at all costs..
She is never going to get properly investigated
Remember when Hillary destroyed evidence under subpoena and nothing happened?
Remember when Seth rich was killed and “robbed” yet nothing was taken from him? Never investigated
Remember all of Bill Clinton’s sexual assaults that were brushed aside?
Remember when Hillary blatantly lied about Benghazi, and nothing happened.
Remembering when Hillary had her lawyers rewrite Comey’s official report so Hillary was not “grossly negligent” just “extremely careless”.. gross negligence is a crime, extremely careless is not
Why would Hillary colluding with media to rig debates or Hillary colluding with dnc to rig primaries result in anything
Comment
Comment