I find them both painfully boring but have more respect for the athletes who play soccer than I do for the athletes who play American football, due to the fact that the average amount of time that the football is actually in play in the American version is 11 minutes per 4 hour game.
The rest of that time is wasted on time outs, penalties/play reviews, commercial breaks/advertising, slow motion replays, sideline interviews, and other tedious bull****.
Say what you want about a lot of soccer players being flopping f*ggots (and I'd be inclined to agree) but at least they're actually pushing themselves out there on the field.
Why do they change the team depending on whether they are attacking or defending? Why can't these guys manage both? Rugby players do it, and don't get the benefit of a break every 30 seconds to allow for cheerleaders, advertisements and other non sport related crap....
American football imho. It's waaaaaaay more strategic and more exciting than soccer. plus american footballers are warriors that leave their body and brain on the field. soccer players are pussified flopping f*ggots who run around for an hour trying to score 1 point.
American football imho. It's waaaaaaay more strategic and more exciting than soccer. plus american footballers are warriors that leave their body and brain on the field. soccer players are pussified flopping f*ggots who run around for an hour trying to score 1 point.
It's a 90 minute game "f*ggot".
hahah
"american footballers are warriors that leave their body and brain on the field"...yeah for what...all 11 minutes yeah?
American football imho. It's waaaaaaay more strategic and more exciting than soccer. plus american footballers are warriors that leave their body and brain on the field. soccer players are pussified flopping f*ggots who run around for an hour trying to score 1 point.
That is the exact anwser I expected from uneducated, ignoring red neck
Comment