Do you think that there's any legitimacy to this so called illuminati?

[PinoyNation]

Except for there's no evidence that doing so can actually "program" a person, there's no evidence that this sort of thing has ever taken place ever, and there's no evidence that "the Illuminati" exists.

So what you have is a complete fantasy.

Trauma-based Disassociative Identity Disorder definitely exists.

A book recently came out by Kim Noble, "All of Me." She has been tested extensively by psychiatrists at University College of London and has been found to have over 20 different personalities. The fragmentation of her mind has been attributed to abuse she suffered as a baby at the hands of a pedophile ring....but if you look at the artwork that some of her personalities draw there seems to have been Satanism and kabbalah rituals involved as well.





If you like you can check out some of the other drawings that her "alters" have drawn here. http://kimnoble.com/virtual_galleries.htm

They contain disturbing images so be warned.

Is this absolute proof that programming exists? Not necessarily. But it does at least point to the fact that Satanic child molesters are out there and that they have ritualistic ways of ****ing with the minds of children. It's not too hard for me to believe that they can take advantage of them when in this state to create a "programmed" personality.

[Enayze]

[Bretty Poy32]

weird ****..........

[The Noose]

Just watched pacquiao KO hatton..but it's on youtube..can't be true.

What a fantastically ******ed response.

[The Noose]

complete ****..........

Corrected it for you.

[BoZz]

What a fantastically ******ed response.

Wow good comeback

[jabsRstiff]

I don't undesrtand the paranoia concerning the Freemasons.

[Barn]

I don't undesrtand the paranoia concerning the Freemasons.

Neither do I, my Grandpa was one.

[jabsRstiff]

Neither do I, my Grandpa was one.

So many of America's founding fathers were as well.

[The Noose]

Wow good comeback

More pointless sarcasm? Bravo! (see what i did there)

Trouble is, i suggested that you cannot simply state a conspiracy theory is true because you watched a video about it. You then responded with " I watched pac ko Hatton...it cant be true". What does that even mean? What was your response actually trying to say? I dont think you even know do you.