Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

weed was meant to be smoked

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by The_Bringer View Post
    Being a person who has smoked both tobacco products as well as marijuana, I find your notion that weed offers 'no resistance' to lungs utterly laughable.

    Equally laughable is your argument that because marijuana grows naturally, it cannot be considered a drug. Following that particularly stupid school of thought, plenty of things ranging from DMT and psilocybin, to LSA and peyote, to atropine and ricin shouldn't be considered drugs, either.

    Except they are.

    I should make it clear that I'm not anti-marijuana. Infact, I favor legalization of a variety of currently illegal drugs. What I am, however, is anti-stupidity. Which is found in copious amounts of daily marijuana smokers.

    No offense, but as long as idiots like yourself (who are notorious for using such mind-numbingly ******ed arguments) are the ones who are framing the marijuana debate in this country, you'll never be able to smoke weed freely anytime soon.
    As a stoner, I agree with 100% of this

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by Sweet Pea 50 View Post
      Well, that sounds somewhat "fair", I guess.

      Even if weed was legalized down here in Cali, couldn't see myself blazing up in public, like if I was smoking a cancer stick.
      I'm from Venice. The entire beach smells like weed now. Not that it was ever uncommon here, but much more now.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by Slip Stream View Post
        I work in an environment of extreme drug use and addiction, and I have yet to meet any of my clients that have lost their homes, families, friends or jobs due to marijuana abuse.
        Somebody abusing marijuana is unlikely to have any of these things in the first place.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by squealpiggy View Post
          Somebody abusing marijuana is unlikely to have any of these things in the first place.
          That isn't true bro, and I can speak from personal experience, can you?

          Comment


          • #45
            If someone wants to smoke weed, I don't care if they do in the privacy of their own home.

            S**t, it's legal in my state, in the privacy of your home. That's what most people don't realize, you can't just walk down the street in Colorado and Washington and smoke freely, it's legal inside your home.

            But to infer that Weed has no negative impact on the human body, that's just not accurate. It has an impact on the lungs, brain, heart rate, blood pressure, and social behavior.
            Last edited by 4Corners; 01-07-2013, 12:28 PM.

            Comment


            • #46
              Uranium occurs in nature too, but i wouldnt smoke it

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by Russian Crushin View Post
                Uranium occurs in nature too, but i wouldnt smoke it
                you would if you could.

                phuckin' crack head.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by The_Bringer View Post
                  Being a person who has smoked both tobacco products as well as marijuana, I find your notion that weed offers 'no resistance' to lungs utterly laughable.

                  Equally laughable is your argument that because marijuana grows naturally, it cannot be considered a drug. Following that particularly stupid school of thought, plenty of things ranging from DMT and psilocybin, to LSA and peyote, to atropine and ricin shouldn't be considered drugs, either.

                  Except they are.

                  I should make it clear that I'm not anti-marijuana. Infact, I favor legalization of a variety of currently illegal drugs. What I am, however, is anti-stupidity. Which is found in copious amounts of daily marijuana smokers.

                  No offense, but as long as idiots like yourself (who are notorious for using such mind-numbingly ******ed arguments) are the ones who are framing the marijuana debate in this country, you'll never be able to smoke weed freely anytime soon.
                  This was brutal......Bringer you are killin it as of late.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Cuauhtémoc1520 View Post
                    This was brutal......Bringer you are killin it as of late.
                    He's not the dude to get pissed off on a forum, that's for sure.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by Even Money View Post
                      Pretty much every kind of smoke is dangerous.

                      The biggest indication is that it hurts when you inhale or you get sick- this serves as an evolutionary warning. But when you inhale weed there's no resistance.. it's 10x smoother than tobacco(minus factory additives.)

                      Weed isn't even a drug. It grows naturally.. and doesn't have to be manufactured. People have been smoking weed since the beginning of time and so that means we and the plant have evolved together symbiotically.
                      Smoking hash kills me (still love it doe) and if you smoke some dirt weed it tastes like ******* smoke burning your throat death. I don't think its meant to be smoked but its not not meant to be smoked . Kind of like drinking soda lmao. Either way who cares smoke it anyway

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP