The final US Presidential debate

[Trigger unhappy]

You're incredibly stupid if you think Romney won this debate.

What debate did you watch?

[arraamis]

non-interventionist ... If only we could adopt that strategy.

[Russian Crushin]

CNN has it 48-40% Obama. Romney was thought to have done better than expected though.

CNN is suggesting that the Obama camp think Florida is leaning towards Romney...and that Romney probably has influenced Virginia enough based on his intentions to build 15 navel ships there which Obama opposes...which would put Romney ahead with electoral votes...leaving Ohio as the key state.

A higher % thought Obama did better then people expected then Romney

[The Tase]

Moderate Mitt endorsing President Obama's foreign policy. It's not too late for people to change their vote to Gary Johnson who has a completely different foreign policy than both. Gary Johnson wants to bring back the foreign policy of the founding fathers, non-interventionist.

non-interventionist ... If only we could adopt that strategy.

you think any president can have a non interventionist policy in this era and win american politics?

not saying i disagree, i hate wars but no president can survive the 24 hr media onslaught in this very partisan era of politics as a non interventionist especially with nuclear Iran looming and the arab spring still going on.

just look at what they are doing to obama, the guy destroys al queda and kills bin landen yet they have a problem with his wording in regards to the benghazi attacks.

no politician can realistically survive a non interventionist policy. Not politically feasible at all even though i agree with a non interventionist policy. the right will call you a coward and the political machine will blame you for anything going wrong in the world despite how out of your hands it is.

[Russian Crushin]

you think any president can have a non interventionist policy in this era and win american politics?

not saying i disagree, i hate wars but no president can survive the 24 hr media onslaught in this very partisan era of politics as a non interventionist especially with nuclear Iran looming and the arab spring still going on.

just look at what they are doing to obama, the guy destroys al queda and kills bin landen yet they have a problem with his wording in regards to the benghazi attacks.

no politician can realistically survive a non interventionist policy. Not politically feasible at all even though i agree with a non interventionist policy. the right will call you a coward and the political machine will blame you for anything going wrong in the world despite how out of your hands it is.

Yes of course, it is impossible at this point in american politics

[LeG00N]

Explain how Romney won, please. All he did was agree with President Obama on most issues, while shape-shifting on his position on Afghanistan. He previously said it wasn't wise to reveal a withdrawal date, but now he's for the 2014 withdrawal. What does this dude stand for? He has no backbone and will say whatever he feels people want to hear. That's not leadership. Say what you want about Obama, but he's been steadfast in his positions.

Romney was more consistent with his talking points and delivered them better.

The actual subject matter of their discussions means next to nothing. It's always full of lies and mistakes. Romney speaks better than Obama, and Obama looked like he was reaching at times. His attacks came off as fake and pushy.

Romney captivated his Hispanic audience. He spoke to us tonight with his Latin America points and we listened. Romney won this by a hair.

[RajahBell]

Marines still use bayonettes, navy said they need more ships, obamas doubled the national debt in 4 years if your voting for this guy you want america to fail.

Neither guy is going to make significant reductions in the national debt. Romney talks about get the country on the road to a balance budget, not an actual balanced budget. He has no realistic plan to reducing the debt significantly. If the debt is your main issue, then take a look at Gary Johnson. He has an honest plan and veiw in reducing the debt, by cutting the size of government significantly. Not the small insignificant measures moderate Mitt has proposed and not the socialist taxation of the President.

[One_Tycoon]

non-interventionist ... If only we could adopt that strategy.

Yes....and I'll take that order to go on the domestic front as well. Non-Interventionist economic system.

[RajahBell]

non-interventionist ... If only we could adopt that strategy.

you think any president can have a non interventionist policy in this era and win american politics?

not saying i disagree, i hate wars but no president can survive the 24 hr media onslaught in this very partisan era of politics as a non interventionist especially with nuclear Iran looming and the arab spring still going on.

just look at what they are doing to obama, the guy destroys al queda and kills bin landen yet they have a problem with his wording in regards to the benghazi attacks.

no politician can realistically survive a non interventionist policy. Not politically feasible at all even though i agree with a non interventionist policy. the right will call you a coward and the political machine will blame you for anything going wrong in the world despite how out of your hands it is.

It's only impossible if the uneducated American people keep voting for the two main parties. But if they learn the founding principles of America, then their is a case for Non-interventionism. It was not me, Ron Paul, or Gary Johnson's idea, but the idea of our founding fathers. George Washington warned us about entangling alliances and President Jefferson adopting non-interventionism.

[RespekonMyName]

Romney was more consistent with his talking points and delivered them better.

The actual subject matter of their discussions means next to nothing. It's always full of lies and mistakes. Romney speaks better than Obama, and Obama looked like he was reaching at times. His attacks came off as fake and pushy.

Romney captivated his Hispanic audience. He spoke to us tonight with his Latin America points and we listened. Romney won this by a hair.

hahahaha!! Romney was more consistent? He flipped on Afghanistan; tried to flip on the auto bailout but Obama blasted him; and flipped on Iran by suddenly agreeing with Obama's handling of Iran sanctions.

Also, he speaks better than Obama? Romney was tripping over his words like Zab Judah tonight. He was lost and had no specifics. Obama schooled him. Here's the key difference: Romney was tutored on foreign policy issues, while Obama has set them.

By the way, Obama has 70% of the Latino vote. Romney encourages "self-deportation," while Obama issued the deferred action executive order that prevents young immigrants from being deported. Obama has also signed several trade agreements in Latin America.